The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 247

New comment
 

Let's skip the roulette, lottery and other irrelevant shit.

Here's a challenge for you from our field:

At the beginning of the year, you open an account. You put in $1,000. You traded quite successfully for a year. During the year you made 5 withdrawals of 50$ each. At the end of the year your account balance is 1100$. Question: What is the efficiency of your trading?

 
Avals:


What does faith have to do with it? in terms of the model. I don't get the randomness part either)) If a man plays roulette not at random, but based on the system, then it is not random?

I don't understand your measure of efficiency in relation to the market:

The amount of useful work produced in a certain period of time.

And the cache that has been earned and withdrawn is the useful work produced. Failure to account for this produced useful work results in the loss of important information about the efficiency of the system.

What is its essence and why is it necessary to withdraw it? You can simply not use them in trading (reduce the lot, for example).


Let's skip roulette, lottery and other irrelevant shit.

Here's a problem from our field:

At the beginning of the year you open an account. You deposited $1000. You traded quite successfully for a year. During the year you made 5 withdrawals of 50$ each. At the end of the year your account balance is 1100$. Question: What is the efficiency of your work?

 
avtomat:

Let's skip the roulette, lottery and other irrelevant shit.

Here's a challenge for you from our field:

At the beginning of the year, you open an account. You put in $1,000. You traded quite successfully for a year. During the year you made 5 withdrawals of 50$ each. At the end of the year your account balance is 1100$. Question: What is the efficiency of your trading?


I don't know what you mean by effective)) your profit is 250$ + 100$. It's true that you should not count by balance but by equity. As if you closed all your positions now.
 
avtomat:

Let's skip the roulette, lottery and other irrelevant shit.

Here's a challenge for you from our field:

At the beginning of the year, you open an account. You put in $1,000. You traded quite successfully for a year. During the year you made 5 withdrawals of 50$ each. At the end of the year your account balance is 1100$. Question: What is the efficiency of your trading?

If you introduce the costs (time, electricity, depreciation of equipment, etc.) into the efficiency formula, I would say that the efficiency is low.
 
Avals:

I don't know what you mean by efficiency)) the profit is $250 + $100. But it's not the balance that counts, it's equity. As if you closed all your positions now.

So at the end of the year you closed all your positions. What is the efficiency of your work? Calculate it as you see fit.
 
ULAD:
If you put costs (time, electricity, depreciation, etc.) into the efficiency formula, I would say that the efficiency is low.


Well only it is not necessary to be wise. There's no point...

There is raw data. A question is posed. The answer to the question is to give a specific number derived from the analysis of the raw data. Estimates such as high/low are not appropriate, because they are relative estimates.

 
avtomat:

So at the end of the year you have closed all the positions. What is your performance? Calculate it the way you think is right.
Efficiency (of funds invested) usually refers to the ratio of profit to funds invested. In a growth business, a satisfactory description of profit is given by the hyperbola equation: P= A - B/K. Where A and B are coefficients, with A=Pmaxbeing the maximum possible profit under competitive market conditions. Break-even point: K(b/a) = B/A. Efficiency as defined by E = P/K = A/K - B/K^2. This relationship already has a maximum at K(opt) = 2B/A = 2K(b/a). Consequently, if one invests inK(opt)businesses, they will operate at maximum efficiency.
 
yosuf:
Efficiency (of funds invested) usually refers to the ratio of profit to funds invested. In a developing business, a satisfactory description of profit is given by the hyperbola equation: P= A - B/K. Where A and B are ratios, with A=Pmaxbeing the maximum possible profit under competitive market conditions. Break-even point: K(b/a) = B/A. Efficiency as defined by E = P/K = A/K - B/K^2. This relationship already has a maximum at K(opt) = 2B/A = 2K(b/a). Consequently, if one invests inK(opt)businesses, they will operate at maximum efficiency.


This goes the other way...

What is the answer to the question posed in the elementary problem above?

 
avtomat:


That goes the other way...

What is the answer to the question posed in the elementary problem above?

This is the steppe in real market conditions where investors should be guided when diversifying their business. Then you must give a clear definition of efficiency in your understanding of the forex market, as here withdrawal (withdrawal, CASH) of profits does not guarantee the safety of invested funds in the future. Another thing is when the invested funds are fully withdrawn in the form of profits, only after that you can confidently reason about efficiency.
 
avtomat:


Don't get any ideas. That's not the point...

There is raw data. A question is posed. The answer to the question is to give a specific number derived from the analysis of the raw data. Estimates such as high/low do not apply here, because they are relative estimates.


Efficiency in the market below 60% (according to yosuf) is a waste of time. For pensioners a good pastime).
1...240241242243244245246247248249250251252253254...551
New comment
Reason: