The market is a controlled dynamic system. - page 8
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I put the question differently: "Determine the X-cause leading to the Y-effect"
We can see it in regression analysis, for example, in the form of a regression coefficient...or in another way (we get the answer as a function, for example)...that is, as a teacher we put in what we want to end up working on, and the input - what we look for dependence on...then we look...
Is there any difference in principle? You are essentially predicting backwards. This is a good method of model identification, but only for stationary processes, for others it is undesirable to say the least.
there is certainly a difference ;) as between cause and effect
there is certainly a difference ;) as between cause and effect
Let me try again, you are predicting backwards, there is no point in that on forex quotes and any of their transformations. None at all. Such an approach is not something new, it is well described, and has narrow applicability. You won't get any new information about the series.
PS: But not interfering, have fun :o)
No. I don't predict backwards.
Oh, that's okay. I'll keep having fun ;)
whoever described it, I want to test my idea ;)
And this idea should produce something like this:
(left and right of Y are aperiodic links)
and I've just realised what the reason for this reluctance is...
You're looking for a "formula", I'm building my model as a tracking system.
.
and to be precise in definitions, the control signal of the model is the dotted line in the bottom window
and I've just realised what the reason for this reluctance is...
You are looking for a "formula", I am building my model as a tracking system.
.
and to be precise in definitions, the control signal of the model is the dotted line in the bottom window
And what prevents you from using the formula as well with adapting it depending on the current situation?
Tracking system == adaptation? Is there a fundamental difference?
The main thing in both systems is to find a "true" parameter for adaptation (read - some kind of misalignment signal in the tracking system).
However, a tracking system may be 'active' but an adaptive system is more likely to be passive...
Automatic...sorry, maybe I don't get it...just want to understand...haven't got it yet...
Here's an example along the lines of your last screenshot...
so I put the control (bottom line on the screen) in the top...
so what... what is the difference if I just take this control line and use it when crossing through 0 ... i.e. why complicate things...