What form, let's assume a physical body, does time have? Your opinion. - page 62

New comment
 
solar:
I suggest the topic be renamed the smoking room (at least be honest with yourself)

No )))) Strictly forbidden as a forum thread title (:
 
MetaDriver:

There's a lot of focus on time. And no one's interested in what the form is. As if the form was kind of clear. What, too obscene? Taboo?

That's easy. The form of impermanence.
 
for amateurs: time is four-dimensional. few good maths on the site. funky. http://www.polynumbers.ru/index.php?lang=ru
 
IDLER:
for amateurs: time is four-dimensional....
More to the point, it is ephemeral.
 
Time is five measures and Fridays are dimensionless.
 
Well, yeah.
 
paukas:
What do you know about time, mortals!
The Creator has ensured that we do not know the fact of our death. Then we are immortal!
 
ratnasambhava:

From my life experience and some knowledge, there is much doubt about the homogeneity of time. On the contrary, time is heterogeneous. And about space, I think the same, though not so obvious.

Quite right, each process has its own time. No process - no time (J. Newton).
 
solar:
Time is five measures, and on Fridays it is dimensionless.
And when we sleep, time stops, at least for the sleeper. Therefore, time is a factor of evaluation of movement or change. If there is no change, there is no time. For example, for a prisoner in solitary confinement, time is an insignificant factor.
 
IDLER:
for amateurs: time is four-dimensional. not many good mathematicians on the site. cool.http://www.polynumbers.ru/index.php?lang=ru
Physicists are confused by declaring time as the fourth dimension. Time has nothing to do with the other 3 dimensions. Time is not material, so to speak.
1...55565758596061626364656667
New comment