Stops - page 23

 
paukas:

Well, it's simple then.

Any operation should ideally be matched to the strength of the signal.

To close a buy 1 lot you need a sell signal of strength 1

To reverse a buy you need a sell signal of strength 2

To close half, a strength signal of 0.5




Closing a position is not necessarily a signal in the opposite direction. A situation where your system no longer has an advantage (or is uncertain) can also be a reason to exit.

 
Svinozavr:

Alas - I haven't noticed any sane (and I need it! right now!)) logic to the pose reduction in the thread. So, very figurative, very expressive... About nothing...

The main question (who has encountered it - share!): close immediately and roll over (1); just close (2); shorten (3).

Where, what are the conditions for the options?

I respectfully await your opinions.


If input is suppose to be 1 lot, and outputs can be partial of known size (e.g. 0.5 lots), it is actually 2 systems or its modifications which can be and must be tested separately. I.e. it is equivalent to two inputs (simultaneous 0.5 lots) and two outputs. It is the same with partial inputs - split into elementary input/output subsystems in equal lots. I.e. partial inputs or outputs are actually trades from different systems, or one system with slightly different parameters. Each of them must be efficient in its own right.
 

Since we are operating with images, I propose the following option

if we drive a light car and fast, we need to twist the steering wheel fast on the bends

and if we drive a heavy car, then the turns should (so it would be desirable) be smaller and the radiuses larger and the steering wheel should not be turned fast

All the people here (it seems to me) cars are slow (in the sense of getting up to date information and reacting) and the turns are too fast

By the way a stop can only be used if you can predict a pothole (no road)

 
Svinozavr:

The speech is not a boy's, but... not a girl's.

Thank you. Much appreciated.

===

Yep (that's me bitching), a stop is the kind of thing that, by virtue of fantasies and devoured psilocybe, takes content before it takes form. Ugh.

Reshetov! Did I say something about prescriptions, huh?

Clearly, there's no such thing as a common prescription. And the Volga is going senile. And the moon is chomping at the bit on critical days. What's next? "Friends, let's all die..."

It's about the general principles of MM here. Or rather, RM.

People have CONCRETE strategies, and in them - there is a specific RM. Yes - everyone has a different one. But that in no way implies the absence of the presence of the common, reasonable, eternal, good. (Oh, come on.)

Reshetov! Confess! This post was one of your Stops?))

Frankly speaking, I use hard stops in some strategies, trailing stops in others, and no stops at all in others (for example arbitrage or portfolio). And with takeprofit it is also not all the same, for example with trailing stops, in the majority of cases they are absolutely useless, because it is more profitable to close using signals and stops are just a precaution.

Simply put, you set the problem in the following vein: go there, I do not know where, and bring me something I do not know what.

Try, for example, asking your doctor to diagnose you remotely without presenting the results of any tests and without telling you anything about your condition: where and what hurts, like trying to guess three times. Such a diagnosis can only be made unambiguously and without any collegial discussion by a representative of the only specialised aestheticians - a psychiatrist.

 
Reshetov:
...

Try, for example, asking your doctor to diagnose you remotely without presenting the results of any tests and without informing you about your condition: where and what hurts, like trying to guess three times. ...

DZ. OPZ
 
Svinozavr:

...

Alas - I haven't noticed any sane (and I need it! right now!)) pose reduction logic in the thread. So, very figurative, very expressive... about nothing...

...

how can you be taken seriously? :о)

Main question (who has faced it - share!): close immediately and roll over (1); just close (2); shorten (3).

There is no universal answer to this question. It does not exist as a class.

 
waiting... waiting... waiting...
 
Farnsworth:

how can anyone take you seriously? :о)

there is no universal answer to this question. It doesn't exist as a class.

We wait...
 

Not waiting, but waiting's.

Imho, people haven't noticed the question:

Main question (who has faced it - share!): close immediately and roll over (1); just close (2); shorten (3).

Where, what are the conditions for the options?

Respectfully awaiting your views.

 
tara:

Not waiting, but waiting's.

Imho, people haven't noticed the question:

Main question (who has faced it - share!): close immediately and roll over (1); just close (2); shorten (3).

Where, what are the conditions for the options?

Respectfully awaiting your views.


Too lazy to retype: bring it in...
Reason: