Maybe it seems similar :) like this - the direction of the majors and the cross... - In fact, the chart shows the same as the cross - but there is no problem with the direction of the deal on the cross ...
so when sliding, we can make money on situations ----- up :::.up:::.up sharply down:::...up:::...sideways down::...down::::...down sharply down::...sideways sideways::...up:::. up ---- when sliding extends --- up :::.down ::..sideways up :::. sideways:::.up sideways::. downwards ::. downwards --- and flip sideways::. sideways ::.
i.e., purely on a cross, we would have to guess which way the quote would go up or down... and here it's only ++ at any variant of slippage.
Allow the use of cookies to log in to the MQL5.com website.
Please enable the necessary setting in your browser, otherwise you will not be able to log in.
You are signed in. Two-factor authentication has been disabled. Set it up again and scan a new QR code, or continue with two-factor authentication disabled.
What's the grail there? What is the idea? Be specific (you can also take it to a personal note).
You need to be clear whether market patterns are being used or the quotation-execution peculiarities of the DC.
Then it's similar to working on EURGBP.
nope
ZS: well maybe )
contact technical support, when I was looking for the terms and conditions I couldn't find them myself, they gave me a link
in earlier pages, the strategy was laid out in the form of script code
which DC's technical support?
Then it is similar to the EURGBP.
Maybe it seems similar :) like this - the direction of the majors and the cross... - In fact, the chart shows the same as the cross - but there is no problem with the direction of the deal on the cross ...
Eur!Gbp!Eur!
Usd!Usd!Gbp!
---+---+---+
___!___!_↑_!
_↑_!_↑_!_↑_!
==========
_↑_!_↓_!_→_!
==========
_↑_!_→_!_↑_!
==========
_↓_!_↑_!_→_!
==========
_↓_!_↓_!_↓_!
___!___!_↓_!
==========
_↓_!_→_!_↓_!
==========
_→_!_↑_!_↑_!
==========
_→_!_↓_!_↓_!
==========
_→_!_→_!_→_!
==========
so when sliding, we can make money on situations
-----
up :::.up:::.up sharply
down:::...up:::...sideways
down::...down::::...down sharply
down::...sideways
sideways::...up:::. up
----
when sliding extends
---
up :::.down ::..sideways
up :::. sideways:::.up
sideways::. downwards ::. downwards
---
and flip
sideways::. sideways ::.
i.e., purely on a cross, we would have to guess which way the quote would go up or down... and here it's only ++ at any variant of slippage.
2sanyooooook: is this true or has it been cleaned up already? :-)))
you know, the one you're asking for
which DC am I asking for?
what is it, and what is the calculation?
"in the earlier pages, the strategy was laid out in the form of script code?"