Why don't traders want to put even one profitable Expert Advisor on the web? - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
There you go! You have uncovered a conspiracy in the forum against Grail owners! all Grail owners are sure to be banned, IP counted, IP numbers passed on to all brokers and ................
))))))))))))
ZS: another kind of phobia - graalephobia, or maybe graalemania?
So why was the topic immediately deleted? It implies that the register is just an excuse...
The banshee thought it was too much editing, it was easier to delete
it is unlikely the existence of such a grail is realistic in most people's minds ... but statistically profitable programs do exist...
well there you have it, the owner of beautiful stats assumes only the presence of Grails! - photoshop?
ZS: If I were the site administration - I would allow one thread for sellers grails (discuss the price in private messages) and buyers who would unsubscribe how much, and the merged how much earned
Well, everyone remembers the Fap turbo expert ! A respected man told me that a 5 figure dollar amount of copies had been sold. And where is it, overnight scalping !
Spread good developments do affect the market, especially scalpers and pipsers. Forex is not bottomless after all... And the stock market, especially an underdeveloped one - even more so!!!! My friend trades on FORTS, he takes the best bids at extremums. (scalpre in general) complains that one cannot go over the top, there is not enough liquidity.
It's all to blame for the misconception, cultivated on the forums, that an effective EA should not fail when tested.
Everyone is looking for a risk-free strategy that does not exist. And if they do agree that there is risk, they just don't understand what that means.
It's all to blame for the misconception, cultivated on the forums, that an effective EA should not fail when tested.
Everyone is looking for a risk-free strategy that does not exist. And if they do agree that there is a risk, they simply do not understand what it means.
I think a normal EA shouldn't fail neither on the real site nor in the tester... Its success is determined by three factors... the ratio of profitable and losing trades... the ratio of the total profit to loss... and the number of trades
and most importantly - the presence or absence of the probability of losing
I can tell you one more little secret: moderators have one secret place where we keep most of the deleted posts with advertising links and grail codes. So being a moderator is very profitable :)
posting any normal expert here is sawing the thread you're sitting on... a whole carload of dts employees are working in the sweat on methods to combat profitable strategies