Avalanche 6.2 - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I was looking at the same thing today. Only maybe the periods are different.
Where did you look? I just showed it here for the first time - I just made it up (the period is variable! depends on Kaufmann's adaptive MA)
Where did you look? I just showed it here for the first time - I just blinded it (the period is variable! depends on Kaufmann's adaptive MA)
I was looking at my indicator. It's just that the pictures are similar.
Igor, look at the avalanche 7 page in the code base, I've added a few lines with your light hand, it's avalanche extra, in the main article there are a couple of reports: for the whole 2009 and 2010 (haven't done together - not enough space on the C drive). Of course, unambiguously better, but IMHO still on the brink of the abyss - I'm too demanding of products (and Galina says: WHAT).
I don't have free time, but I'll definitely deal with your code, I've traded my Expert Advisor on EURUSD demo account for 24 hours:
Initial deposit 5k, this is without equity trail, but with a dynamic channel and primitive MM, I don't know the essence of channel calculation for the original Avalanche, but if you believe Gunn etc. :) then the price goes under 45 degrees
(as well as the balance).
Consider the following avalanche option:
Entry 1 lot, TP 50pp, SL 10pp. When the SL is triggered, we open a "reverse" position in the opposite direction, with the same stops. At SL choose such volume of the reversal order, that through 50pp, to withdraw the cycle in b / o.
The volume will be as follows:
entry 1 lot
1st reversal 0.2 lot
2nd reverse 0.24 lot
3rd - 0.29 lot
4th- 0.35 lot
5th- 0.42 lot
6th- 0.50 lot
7th- 0.60 lot
8th- 0.72 lot
9th- 0.86 lot
10th- 1.04 lot
etc.
as you can see, on the 10th roll we reach the volume equal to the volume of the first entry and then on the increase. The average daily range of almost any instrument is larger than 50 points, so there is a good possibility to pass this 50 points on the day of the first entry.
This is described in the article by Olchik, I do not know where it is (the article).
Of course, it is all in a condensed form...
Consider the following avalanche option:
Entry 1 lot, TP 50pp, SL 10pp. When the SL is triggered, we open a "reverse" position in the opposite direction, with the same stops. At SL choose such volume of the reversal order, that through 50pp, to withdraw the cycle in b / o.
The volume will be as follows:
entry 1 lot
1st reversal 0.2 lot
2nd reverse 0.24 lot
3rd - 0.29 lot
4th- 0.35 lot
5th- 0.42 lot
6th- 0.50 lot
7th- 0.60 lot
8th- 0.72 lot
9th- 0.86 lot
10th- 1.04 lot
etc.
as you can see, on the 10th roll we reach the volume equal to the volume of the first entry and then on the increase. The average daily range of almost any instrument is larger than 50 points, so there is a good possibility to pass this 50 points on the day of the first entry.
This is described in the article by Olchik, I do not know where it is (the article).
Of course, all of this is in short form...
If the lot does not increase proportionally, then we increase the target TP.
so the 1st target is 20 pips
flip target is 40 pips.
flip 80
if the lot is not growing.
the total is put in the drawdown and wait for possible movement.
If the lot does not increase proportionally , then we increase the target TP.
so the 1st target is 20 pips
flip target is 40 pips. {...}
What does this mean...?
Do you insist that with a lot {0.2, 0.24, 0.29 etc. } there will be no profit?
What does this mean...?
You're saying that with {0.2, 0.24, 0.29, etc. } lot there will be no profit?
I insist that the Expert Advisor will be hanging, i.e. neither profit nor loss will be generated from it.
I have swum in this direction.
IMHO. (the result is not very good)
If you do not know the difference between the profit and the loss, then you may calculate the loss as a percentage of the requested profit.
But as a strategy, namely depending on the volatility the selection of the optimal target and as a consequence a floating lot.
From my own experience - not a single martin will hold more than 6 knees.
The main thing to do is to choose the best option, and the only thing you need to do is to choose the most appropriate one.
this one (as an option) is interesting to drive...
I just tweaked the code https://www.mql5.com/ru/code/9878 and added equity trawl and improved MM from 4Jan2010 to 1Jul2010:
Initial deposit 10000.00
Net Profit 10207.18 Total Profit 61127.53 Total Loss -50920.35
Profitability 1.20 Expected payoff 12.30
Absolute drawdown 2278.62 Maximum drawdown 6816.48 (46.89%) Relative drawdown 46.89% (6816.48)
Total trades 830 Short positions (% win) 770 (93.77%) Long positions (% win) 60 (83.33%)
Profitable trades (% of all) 772 (93.01%) Loss trades (% of all) 58 (6.99%)
Largest profitable trade 6391.10 losing trade -9552.60
Average profitable trade 79.18 losing trade -877.94
Maximal number of continuous wins (profit) 80 (5005.43) continuous losses (loss) 4 (-14104.40)
Maximum number of continuous profits (number of wins) 14690.22 (60) continuous losses (number of losses) -14104.40 (4)
Average continuous gain 29 continuous loss 2
put a trend indicator into wmlab advisor (first order of a trend group)
the result in 10 years on alpari micro
maximal lot 1.92 - 40 000 RUB drawdown, for the entire period there were only 5 lots 1.92, i.e. I can safely start with 50 000 RUB.
or on cents DTs...