Avalanche 6.2 - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
1. there you go, classic...
2. I'd like to run a script like that... is there one in the public domain?
3. these fluctuations are finite, I'm making a prediction that the price will exit the channel, sooner or later. right? and this prediction will 100% come true, just like the one that the price goes left to right.
1. is this bad or good?
2. I do not have such a script. I have been using for a long time only OHLC (and sometimes, because of laziness, "classical indicators") on minutes, and the rest - MS SQL, Acces, Excel and more specialized packages (NSDT, NS, NS2, TS, Somine etc.).
3. understand (do the math for yourself)
You have a deposit, you have a lot increase algorithm. On the ninth (conditional) iteration your Deposit will run out.
On the pair of interest "once a year" (arbitrarily) the price touched the channel of 89 pips nine times (even more arbitrary). Then you have to dance from there.
In the same year you would get 368 cents of profit. But for a channel that was touched 6 times in one year, you would have made a profit of 895 cents that year.
Yes it's a fit with history, just like everything else we say (past tense verb) and write (past tense verb).
Except you figure it all out (algorithm + width) and you'll immediately know that "Statistics is a pseudoscience" (Statistics on Xforex). And you won't care why - NeBernali or NeGaus etc etc.
!
1. is this bad or good?
2. I don't have such script. I have long been unloading only OHLC (and sometimes, due to laziness, "classic indicators") on minutes, and everything else - MS SQL, Acces, Excel and more specialized packages (NSDT, NS, NS2, TS, Somine, etc.)
3. understand (do the math for yourself)
You have a deposit, you have a lot increase algorithm. On the ninth (conditional) iteration your Deposit will run out.
On the pair of interest "once a year" (arbitrarily) the price touched the channel of 89 pips nine times (even more arbitrary). Then you have to dance from there.
In the same year you would get 368 cents of profit. But for a channel that was touched 6 times in one year, you would have made a profit of 895 cents that year.
Yes it's a fit with history, just like everything else we say (past tense verb) and write (past tense verb).
Except that you will calculate all this (algorithm + width) and immediately know that "Statistics is a pseudoscience" (Statistics on Xforex). And you won't care why - NeBernali or NeGaus, etc. etc.
!
1. bad, i.e. like everyone else.
I'll answer later ...
1. bad, i.e. like everyone else.
Do you think everyone writes what they think? (No keyboard can take it)
I'll answer later ...
Don't. Everything will go back to the way it was before.
1. bad, i.e. like everyone else.
I will answer later ...
You think everyone writes what they think? (No keyboard can hold that.)
Don't. Everything will go back to the way it was.
I thought they wrote what they thought... I mean half.
I won't, I see you've got the circle drawn, you can't go beyond it.
and I thought they wrote what they thought... I'm talking about the catch.
and I thought they were writing what they thought... I'm talking about the tactics of escorting the catching positions.
or
and I thought they were writing what they thought... I mean the complete and self-sufficient strategy from the first post of the catch.
I will not, I see that you have the circle already drawn, beyond the boundaries - no
You know best :)
To the brave we sing a song...
And we don't really know what kind of Expert Advisor you have - maybe it has nothing to do with Martin and Avalanche, maybe you trade with your hands, or maybe you are cheating :D
I want to discourage the naysayers :)
I trade with an avalanche, the very real one, as I've seen many such versions in the previous thread, and I've even put up invoices.
Hands for probably a year I do not trade, only bots.
I have to say I have never found a nicer robot than LAVINA.
I have never found a BOTTOM better than LAVINE, and I should say I have never found a BOTTOM better.
I have made a conclusion for myself.
There is nothing better than an avalanche.
Everything else comes and goes, and an avalanche is and will be.
And my accounts are proof of that.
You missed the three-letter word ALL. To take your last post as an example.
and I thought they wrote what they thought... I'm talking about tactics to accompany the catching positions.
or
and I thought they were writing what they thought... I mean the complete and self-sufficient strategy from the first post of the catch.
You know best :)
I'm about to develop a complex. You'd better not answer, or write the wrong way or the wrong thing... :)
I remembered in school, in the essay text, the teacher, with a red pen, was completing sentences in a similar way.
I want to disappoint the naysayers :)
I trade an avalanche, a real one, the previous thread was full of these versions and even had invoices on display.
I haven't traded with my hands for probably a year now, only bots.
I have to say I have never found a nicer robot than LAVINA.
I have never found a BOTTOM better than LAVINE, and I should say I have never found a BOTTOM better.
I have made a conclusion for myself.
There is nothing better than an avalanche.
Everything else comes and goes, and an avalanche is and will be.
And my accounts are proof of that.
Where do you always pop out from?
AND YOU?