EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 1205

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
So I'm not alone (another clairvoyant)
I entered a sell, price went the wrong way, I open a buy (above the level or a number of points?) > on a reversal, I buy! (I do not open a Sell position again, just wait?) > the price went down and reached the Sell level (lots are the same?).
For the 2nd variant, the price does not reach the sell level and goes upwards - I compensate a little growing loss with bai (or may I place bigger bai?).
3. The first lot of the sell - should be in the global trend, and the other moves are correction?
With 5 quid, you'll be the first! Market wizards, I read one became a millionaire with $300-500.
400
Let's open a pammican for everyone)))) and go ahead.
What do you mean, one for all? Who's going to trade? Everyone too? Or just Stranger and Tantric? :)))
What do you mean, one for all? Who's going to trade? Everyone too? Or just Stranger and Tantric? :)))
Stranger look option 2 what to do? (i.e. change of trend - cover loss?!)
Variant 2: do nothing until the price reaches the reversal point. At the reversal point, we fix a profitable position, while the loss-making position is not touched. If the price does not go further or sharply transitions into a new wave - then a stop is triggered, and we at least stay with us.
In general, I like variant 4 better, but it's also a bit off.
In variant 2 it is not clear, profitable position was closed, and then I don't understand it. I don't see the point of entering the gap in order to break even.
I would trust Stranger and Tantrik with Uncle Kolya for 50% of the depo.
With 5 quid you will be the first! Market wizards, I read one became a millionaire with $300-500.
The story of chess (and lokhrotron :)) Put one grain on one square, two grains on the second, four grains on the third...
No matter how small the start is, with such a stable trend in 64 moves, the entire forex turnover is yours.
Imho, not the start is not the point, but the levels of transition from quantity to quality, the first level is 300-500 bucks (because it's already scary to take risks).
In variant 2 it's not clear, profitable position was closed, and then I don't understand it. I don't see the point of entering the stock in order to break even.