Martin plus loci - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't want to talk about it anymore, we can talk about it endlessly.
If you want to keep talking mostly to yourself here on the forum, they won't let you talk to yourself. It's a public place, you talk to others here.
But you want someone to get involved and help you. Well, then change the record.
The eternal topic of suckers.
Whatever you do with orders, it all comes down to either a stop-out or a limit fill, with one or more orders of the same direction (only one direction) in the market. In this case you can manipulate the zoom in and out distance, lot, takeprofit, and so on.
Adding. If lot is specified or changed according to some rule that does not depend on TakeProfit, TakeProfit is calculated. If takeprofit is set or varies by a rule that does not depend on the lot, the lot is calculated.
Rollover. Also - several parameters can be changed as planned, the remaining parameters are calculated. Level of rollover (stop loss) may change according to the plan, it doesn't have to be constant. Takeprofit may change according to the plan or lot. If takeprofit varies - calculate the lot; if the lot varies according to the plan - calculate takeprofit.
And this is all. Nothing else exists in nature. All the rest is self-deception and mental masturbation.
The tester will find out which of the above is better by means of optimization. You can even set a plan: how many fills, then how many flips, etc., and it too can be optimized.
Do not wonder how and at whose expense I earned it. that in such a short time, a man without giving caciques to anyone can turn himself into a monster?
I did not start the record, these are facts, of course I did not say directly about the secrets, this is in the future, but I try to speculate about some thoughts and their orientation, and this orientation lies in the area of these secrets, which is so infuriating to trolls.
There are no secrets here. There are no secrets here. There is elementary logic, mathematics, external parameters and the tester.
I don't mean loci..... it just so happens to be in this thread.....
The only thing is to find out the nature of this movement first, and then you can use locks and martin or not, in short, neither locks nor martin are primary.
But you have to find out the movement character first, and then you may use locks and martin.
This is a very accurate representation of forex. IMHO. Is it possible to identify the nature of the movement here? Of course - up and down with varying amplitude and speed.
And it only takes skill, not scholastic research. At first you fall all the time. Then you begin to fall less frequently. And finally, the bull surrenders to your will. And it's not clear whether the bull obeys or you learn.
This is a very accurate representation of forex. IMHO. Is it possible to identify the nature of the movement here? Of course - up and down with varying amplitude and speed.
And it only takes skill, not scholastic research. At first you fall all the time. Then you begin to fall less frequently. And finally, the bull surrenders to your will. And it's unclear whether the bull obeys or you learn.
rodeo is the intelligent and skilful management of the centre of mass. in the market, this centre has yet to be found.
By the way, how to calculate by body movements, which are many and in different directions, dynamic (with different force and speed) movements, to define centre of mass of the rider relative to the bull? or for a start a simpler problem - how to define mass of both rider and bull ?+ given that for the analysis initially given only speed and acceleration. of course absolute values of mass we will not learn, but proportions of one relative to another probably can.
The lock is a tool for experienced users who want to be in the market at all times, even in an uncertain situation.
If we do not know where the price will go, we enter with two orders, buy and sell.
Wherever the price may go, there is no loss, let's assume the price goes to lower, if this causes the reversal pattern, put a new buy, wait for the confirmation of the reversal.
wait for confirmation of the reversal, close the first Sell. The lock has been removed and trade according to the market.
If we go down and there is no reversal pattern, we wait for the formation of a trend pattern, then buy more sell, wait for
Confirmation of the trend, and close the first buy; the lock is removed and then trade according to the market.
...Wherever the price goes, there is no loss...
The loss is in the double spread and commission, if any.
And that loss is payment for the feeling that you are "always in the market")
Locke is a tool for experienced users who want to be in the market at all times, even in uncertain situations.
1. If you don't know where the price will go, you enter with two orders, buy and sell.
2. Wherever the price may go, there is no loss, let's assume the price goes to lower, if this results in the reversal pattern, put a new buy, wait for it.
3. The reversal confirmation, close the first Sell. The lock has been removed and further trading according to the market.
4. If we go down, but there is no reversal pattern, we wait for the formation of the trend, then place a sell, wait for
5. Confirmation of the trend, and close the first buy; the lock has been removed and then trade according to the market.
How much of this nonsense can you talk? Two orders in different directions... don't open at all and that's it. In or out of the market, it's a subjective feeling, a problem of perceiving yourself in the world around you.
Translate the above message into the language of simple logic.
1. Not doing anything (or placing thirty-eight irons on the windowsill, to feel the market).
2. open a buy.
3. Adding buy.
4. Open a sell.
5. Add in the sell.