EURUSD - Trends, Forecasts and Implications (Part 2) - page 142
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Put yourself in that circle (kind of like homework), never take anyone's word for it...
Why are you so offended?
Why are you throwing such a lot of text?
Just put your vision "on a child's thread".
And everything will become clear... A lot of good it will do.
Sergei, you should be writing books.
However, no, you shouldn't; you'd rather make money. You have developed a system in which you are confident, and you're trading, I think, quite successfully. Good luck to you and have more profit!
About the variants: wave traders have alternative scenarios too. And not even "too", but necessarily do - otherwise it's not a wave maker who doesn't talk about alternatives.
Sergei, you should be writing books.
However, no, you shouldn't; you'd rather make money. You have developed a system in which you are confident, and you're trading, I think, quite successfully. Good luck to you and have more profits!
I agree.
But I have not been impressed by the analysis of quote history.
No deal history. ;)
Let's just abstract it away... ;)
If we only see the coordinates of the point. And how it swings. In time!
It doesn't matter if it's a corpse of a gnat on a wheel, or the right lamp of a tram moving away from us.
Can't we see the trajectory?
And you can't draw conclusions?
Yes, you can... but there's a catch - you'll be waiting for the forecast to work out...
and there are not 1 but 3 forecasts... plus there are no normal tests on history... so no matter how you slice it - it's an illusion...
hz... sometimes I just don't understand programmers or mathematicians... such smart people, but they don't do any tests or anything normal... ....
they make 3 forecasts and wait... why ?))) i don't get it....
so it turns out the fact - 3 synthetic forecasts + need to observe the real price ... compare it to forecasts +.... etc..... etc.... illusion no matter how you spin it ...and it will take you far away....
Yes, you can... but there's a catch - you'll have to wait for the forecast to work out...
and there's not 1 but 3 forecasts... plus there are no normal tests on history... so no matter how you slice it - it's an illusion...
hz... sometimes I just don't understand programmers or mathematicians... such smart people, but they don't do any tests or anything normal... ....
they make 3 forecasts and wait... why ?))) i don't get it....
so it turns out the fact - 3 synthetic forecasts + need to observe the real price ... compare it to forecasts +.... etc..... etc.... illusion no matter how you spin it...and it will take you far away....
Sergei, you should be writing books.
However, no, you shouldn't; you'd rather make money. You have developed a system in which you are confident, and you're trading, I think, quite successfully. Good luck to you and have more profits!
I already have dozens of systems on the shelf, starting from the first Championship. I threw that EA away before the Championship even started.
Why are you so offended?
Why are you throwing so many boobies?
Just put your vision "on a childish thread".
And all will be cleared up... A lot of good it will do.
Unfortunately I can't post my forecasts the way I do it here, if you read the post carefully you'll realise that for me the forecast is something else (I have somewhere around 10-15 minutes more with strict accuracy requirements).
And about hurt, yes really hurt, but not the apponet, and I myself was not satisfied with his reaction, calm you need to be. I hope I'll forgive the forum users for sharpness, I tried as I could redeem the big post, if someone can use it will be glad ...
I took you seriously at first.
Will come seriously after the normal tests...or the plums...the fault of the illusions from these indies... good luck....
I have a question for the turkey experts. I can't figure out one problem.
I have such an indicator:
#property indicator_separate_window
#property indicator_buffers 2
#property indicator_color1 Blue
#property indicator_color2 Red
extern int SSP = 7;
extern double Kmax = 50.6;
extern int CountBars = 80;
double Buff2[];
double Buff3[];
double Buff0[];
double Buff1[];
int init() {
IndicatorBuffers(4);
SetIndexStyle(0, DRAW_HISTOGRAM, STYLE_SOLID, 2);
SetIndexBuffer(0, Buff0);
SetIndexStyle(1, DRAW_HISTOGRAM, STYLE_SOLID, 2);
SetIndexBuffer(1, Buff1);
SetIndexBuffer(2, Buff2);
SetIndexBuffer(3, Buff3);
IndicatorShortName("SS2009_new(" + SSP + ")");
return (0);
}
int deinit() {
return (0);
}
int start() {
double MaxPrice;
double LowPrice;
double move;
if (CountBars >= Bars) CountBars = Bars;
SetIndexDrawBegin(0, Bars - CountBars + SSP);
SetIndexDrawBegin(1, Bars - CountBars + SSP);
if (Bars <= SSP + 1) return (0);
if (IndicatorCounted() < SSP + 1) {
for (int i = 1; i <= SSP; i++) Buff2[CountBars - i] = 0.0;
for (i = 1; i <= SSP; i++) Buff3[CountBars - i] = 0.0;
}
for (i = CountBars - SSP; i >= 0; i--) {
MaxPrice = High[iHighest(NULL, 0, MODE_HIGH, SSP, i - SSP + 1)];
LowPrice = Low[iLowest(NULL, 0, MODE_LOW, SSP, i - SSP + 1)];
move = MaxPrice - (MaxPrice - LowPrice) * Kmax / 100.0;
Buff2[i - SSP + 6] = move;
Buff3[i - SSP - 1] = move;
}
for (int k = CountBars - SSP; k >= 0; k--) {
if (Buff2[k] > Buff3[k]) {
Buff0[k] = 1;
Buff1[k] = 0;
} else {
Buff0[k] = 0;
Buff1[k] = 1;
}
}
return (0);
}
I need to use its data in the robot. And I'm only interested in the last bar, the last value of the indicator.
What's the problem... Actually I've hit such a snag - how does it calculate Buff2[i - SSP + 6] and Buff3[i - SSP - 1] while SSP=7 and counter i=0?
That is, [-1] and [-8] array values...? I can understand if they are zero in this case. But no - the indicator works and works correctly. Please, advise who knows... I am good at writing robots, but I am having troubles with indicator buffers.
I am interested only in the values of the indicator on the last bar, or at most on the next to last one.
I have done so, but obviously not correctly:
MaxPrice = High[iHighest(NULL, 0, MODE_HIGH, SSP, 0)];
LowPrice = Low[iLowest(NULL, 0, MODE_LOW, SSP, 0)];
move = MaxPrice - (MaxPrice - LowPrice) * Kmax / 100.0;
Buff2[0 - SSP + 6] = move;
Buff3[0 - SSP - 1] = move;
Bf2 = Buff2[1];
Bf3 = Buff3[1];
if (Bf2 > Bf3)
{
return (0);
} else
{
return (1);
}
I'm afraid I can't do it here, if you read the post you'll see it's not the same for me (I've got about 10-15 min more, so I'm not getting any better with stiff demands for accuracy).
As for hurt, yes indeed hurt, but not the apponet, and I myself was not satisfied with his reaction, calm you need to be. hope to forgive me for sharpness, I tried as best I could redeem the big post, if someone can use it will be glad ...
You're right... don't be nervous... everyone has their own views... for you, getting into a pose and waiting for it to go negative is normal. for me, it's death... and it's okay. some people like apples and some people like oranges....
I agree about the levels - they will always work....