
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Demonstrate a report/monitoring (even if not your own) where there is a statistically significant number of trades and no losses.
Isn't it obvious for you? Why? I don't see what the problem is with no losses.** I won't show you anything, I don't have a system like invest password and all that crap.
Yoprst.... OK, which is better - 1000% off $100 a month or 10% off $10,000 a month? )))
>> I agree. A stop can be an emergency stop, but that doesn't mean that it should be taken into account, as the main one is a flip. As for the connection and stuff, you can't just leave it to chance, even if you are trading with an EA, because anything can happen. ))))
Show me a report/monitoring (at least not your own) where there is a statistically significant number of trades and no losses.
I have to add. My account is not mine.
Please, tell me how. >> preferably point by point.
How else? >> how is 2000% a month. >> Tell us please. Point by point, please.
Nothing against you, but it's not about China, it's about 2000%. I don't understand your attack.
Isn't it obvious to you? Why not? I don't see what the problem is with doing everything without any losses at all.
You mean he earned 1000 dollars and then loses, instead of steadily earning 10% from 10k? ..... Miracles, however.....)))How else could it be? What about 2000% per month? Please tell me. Point by point, please.
Nothing against you, but it's not about China, it's about 2000%. I don't understand your attack.
It's not a hit-and-run. 2000%, it's just a theory - that with 2000% you can buy China. Because you can't. That's the point. And 2000% is over the limit. By the way.because it is a likely process for us as it is impossible to have all the information about future events and the reactions of all market participants to them... and unnecessary.
It's not a hit-and-run. 2000%, it's just a theory - that with 2000% you can buy China. Because you can't. That's the whole point. And 2000% is over the limit. By the way.
Never mind.