
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
here or elsewhere. because we don't generally know the number of "princes"/bars.
So the distribution of "total choice time" is what's interesting...
There's a lot of scriptwriters around here - maybe someone will make one.
;)
You're welcome! This is on EURUSD minutes, 250 thousand bars analysed.
Descriptive Statistics (BB_distr) Include condition: bb_length<300and here's a picture:
You're welcome! This is on the EURUSD minutes.
Descriptive Statistics (BB_distr) Include condition: bb_length<300and here's a picture:
Just a Miracle! As you'd expect...
Thank you!
The neophytes will be delighted
And where does the exponential distribution come from? How do you calculate the sum of the numbers?
Exponential, because the logarithm of the density of the distribution looks like a straight line with R^2=0.9997. So the assumption is quite reasonable, in my opinion.
In addition, I once gave (not strictly, though, but still) a justification for it to be exponential: in short, it is logically equivalent to a set of two assumptions: 1) the price movement is a reaction to external information and 2) the market is a statistical fractal, i.e. there is a distribution independent of scale.
You got it all wrong.
Forex is a princess. When she thinks she's already "THERE HE IS !", she makes her choice and turns back around. :)
Another thing is that she is not very familiar with the task and especially with the right decision. Right.
So, the trader's tasks are:
1. To determine the competence and the current degree of maturity of the Princesa.
2. To see the queue of Princes a couple of members ahead.
3. To put a limiter in the pocket of a cute enough prince from the queue at the moment when the Princesa is ready for everything.
4. Wait for the U-turn while whistling Mendelssohn.
5. After the turn - see point 1.
;)
You got it all wrong.
Forex is a princess. When she thinks she's already "THERE HE IS !", she makes her choice and turns back around. :)
Another thing is that she is not very familiar with the task and especially with the right decision. Right.
So, the trader's tasks are:
1. To determine the competence and the current degree of maturity of the Princesa.
2. To see the queue of Princes a couple of members ahead.
3. To put a limiter in the pocket of a cute enough prince from the queue at the moment when the Princesa is ready for everything.
4. Wait for the U-turn while whistling Mendelssohn.
5. After the turn - see point 1.
;)
That is why I suggested to apply the strategy to MACD with 33. In doing so I suggest to consider that a move away from zero (as an option for one of the inputs), or better yet, a move away from extremum 33 to the level of two spreads - is already a fact of starting a new look. The task is complicated - the exact length of the resulting queue is not known in advance and therefore the drift of the average may be very considerable.
Don't forget about the arcsinus...
;)
princes on the graph where? prices, increments?
what is the prince's target function? For example, two princes - two prices. The higher the prince, the better? :)
The prince is the accumulated paper profit from the moment the prince has taken a pose (opened). The higher the profit, the better.
What else could it be? But princes are dependent, aren't they?
princes on the chart where? prices, increments?
What is the princess' target function? For example, two princes - two prices. The higher the prince, the better? :)
prince is an extremum.
The princess reducing her prince requirement from the best to one of the top two has increased her chances from 36.8 to 57.4%.
The prince is the accumulated paper profit from the moment the princesso took a pose (opened). The higher the profit, the better.
What else could it be? But the princes are dependent...
What makes you think that? A prince is any extremum on a bounded set.
and I'm tired of hearing the dependency mantra - then the market is bad because it's random and unsteady.
Now it's bad in that it's persistent...
;)