
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
2. I also used to think that using MM with reinvestment for a system with a martin was unrealistic, but when Katana objected, I quickly realised I was wrong. I think I was wrong. There is no difference in its use in a system with or without martin. Unfortunately, you do not understand it yet. For example have an TS that trades with one order with a lot equal to the total lot of an TS with a Martin. Compare if there is any difference in MM with reinvesting in one and the other case?
For example, the deposit has increased proportionally to the lots and what happens - a disaster?
Yuri, I remember this post of yours from the thread... Yes - that's all true, but there is one thing, what about withdrawal of part of profit, in a possible "disaster" - whatever force majeure, with a proportional initial lot size when increasing the profit - it will not be possible ... Katana was silent about it, but kept talking about mandatory withdrawal of parts of the funds with a sufficient increase in the balance... so that they could be used later if necessary. There you go. There's room for thought in that direction. I think you know what I mean?
I just expressed my opinion that there is no fundamental difference in using reinvestment for systems with and without martingale. Obviously, if you withdraw regularly, there will be no reinvestment, no matter what system with or without martingale. You cannot eat your fish and... One or the other.
Without it. It is clear that if you do. regular withdrawals I will not reinvest, no matter what the system is, with or without martingale. You can't eat the fish and you can't... One or the other.
You've been masturbating in this thread for over a year now! Let me ask you, how are you doing with the underlined?
I was merely expressing my opinion that there is no fundamental difference in the use of reinvestment for systems with and without martingale. Obviously, if you withdraw regularly, there will be no reinvestment, no matter what system with or without martingale. You cannot eat your fish and... One or the other.
You have been anonymous in this thread for over a year now! Let me ask you, how are you doing with the underlined?
You have been anonymous in this thread for over a year now! Let me ask you, how are you doing with the underlined?
Allow me to comment... As the "Guru" aka Katana says, read carefully... especially from page 457.
How is it one of the two? :-))) - As an option, when doubling the starting deposit, we withdraw half of it... and then work to the fullest extent with proportional increase in the volume of the starting and subsequent lots with balance increase...
This is a logical continuation of opening more accounts with profits on other currency pairs - will be even smoother distribution of profits - losses.
how are you doing with the underlined?
Ask Galina directly - she knows about it... :-)))
so Rumata went abroad in the first place... (stay here .... to eat your bread)
How is it one of the two? :-))) - As an option, when doubling the starting deposit, we withdraw half of it... and then work to the fullest extent with proportional increase in the volume of the starting and subsequent lots with balance increase...