Avalanche - page 387

 
nikat97:

I join in. Unfortunately most do not see the obvious behind the veil of Fear of losing the entire deposit.....

The forum is an endless chafing .......

Who does not have fear of the occasional large drawdown can use this system and I am sure there will be a lot of profit.

Emotions are similar to those experienced by a casino player :-))). Adrenaline beyond measure, of course, depends on the size of the deposit and what fraction of that deposit is the amount a player spends on life during the year, for example. For some people even a million pennies :-))), but for some people the loss of $1000 can lead to depression :-)))

 
Tantrik:
You yourself have been in the euro market for 2 months or a month and a half with a grid of counter orders, and after one Friday (a no-return move) you disappeared. So what was the end of it - was there a loss, or did you have enough depo - did you sit tight?
Look at the price movement and answer the question... ;)
 

Mischek:

So you agree that instead of proof, there are assumptions that are passed off as evidence?

;)

 
FreeLance:
Look at the price move and answer for yourself... ;)
There was a price reversal. It all depended on the weight of the lots to the depo - ? (I can only judge by how abruptly your humming stopped). Although there was a little bit of a bounce here in early June - ?
 
FreeLance:

So you agree that instead of proof, there are assumptions that are passed off as evidence?

;)


Try turning your processor on somehow, maybe you should stick it in the cold or tap it
 
Tantrik:
There was a price-turn. Everything depended on the weight of the lots to the depo - ? (I can only judge by the way your snickers stopped abruptly). Although there was a little bit of a bounce here in early June - ?

Your way of conducting the conversation does not allow me to take it further.

But I recommend you to follow my thoughts and recommendations more closely...

I share my vision with more well-behaved and constructive interlocutors.

;)

--- and have you not heard of a ban for complicity in dissent at all?

It was for life then. (

And only the intervention of forum authorities allows me to communicate now...

 
FreeLance:

I'm not... ;)


what did you mean by that?
 
FreeLance:

Your way of conducting the conversation does not allow me to take it further.

But I recommend you to follow my thoughts and recommendations more closely...

I share my vision with more well-behaved and constructive interlocutors.

;)


You yourself are no longer able to tone down your own recommendations - i.e. a grid of counter orders. That is the whole question. Good luck.

Bp. You're an innocent victim - and watch out for dissenters.

 
Mischek:

It is impossible to prove the ineffectiveness of an avalanche, especially considering that this strategy does not prohibit entering using thechanalysis. One can imagine 1,000 losing EAs,

created using an avalanche, but this will not be proof of the ineffectiveness of this principle. But one profitable EA is enough to prove the effectiveness of this principle.

 
khorosh:

It is impossible to prove the ineffectiveness of an avalanche, especially considering that this strategy does not forbid entry using thechanalysis. One can imagine 1,000 losing EAs,

created using an avalanche, but this will not be proof of the ineffectiveness of this principle. But one profitable EA is enough to prove the effectiveness of this principle.


Reason: