Avalanche - page 432
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
the topic on this forum has disappeared, on his website the description: http://www.fxclon.net/o-sisteme
from the first second we already have a lock - the risks are crazy, and in an avalanche the order was thrown - wrong place - lock
This lock is liquidated automatically after one of the lock orders closes at the point, and there are no locks in the future - only an asymmetrical lock. The disadvantage of this variant is that locks are used only to bring losing orders to breakeven and do not bring profit. Only one of the primary orders opened with a minimum lot brings profit. This is why the profitability is very low.
This lock is liquidated automatically after one of the lock orders closes at the take over, and there are no further locks - only an asymmetrical lock.
Why would you place a lock at once? by placing a lock you have a guaranteed loss, by placing a single order you have a 50% chance of a positive result.
By the way, I dragged this friend here, he started a thread about "break-even trading".
He lost a few days ago.
Can I have a link to his pamm?
the link along with the PAMM has disappeared
You can search for PAMMs by nickname, that's how I googled Ledyx ;)
You can search for pammers by nickname, that's how I googled the ledyx branch ;)
You can search for pammers by nickname, that's how I googled the ledyx branch ;)
Unequal?!
Impressed, especially since it's known even outside of Runet
Impressed, all the more so because it is known even outside of Runet.
what side do they know from?