Avalanche - page 48
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The lot size management is too complex and serious issue to be solved in one go.
There are other schemes of working with a growing lot, not so aggressive. They still require very significant capital, but if you consider that 15 flips are unrealistically rare, they hold up. Estimating the "last" lot gives a figure of about 100 if the starting lot is 1. But that's a know-how that I'll keep to myself for now.
Adding is no longer a guarantee of an overall positive outcome in a series of build-ups. Although it is certainly not doubling, and the likelihood of stop-outs and huge drawdowns in general can be reduced.
The lot size management is too complex and serious issue to be solved in one go.
There are other schemes of working with a growing lot, not so aggressive. They still require very significant capital, but if you consider that 15 flips are unrealistically rare, they hold up. Estimating the "last" lot gives a figure of about 100 if the starting lot is 1. But that's a know-how that I'm saving for myself for now.
And the breakeven level, in this scheme, is shifting further and further?
切腹 - Actually, that's not how you spell "katana", it's much simpler: 刀 .
How about "Avalanche"? Okay, don't bother: 雪崩 (pronounced "nadare").
Seppuku" and "harakiri" are written with the same two characters. The difference is that seppuku is spelled as 切腹 (the first character is "cut" and then "stomach"; the pronunciation is "ony", a Sino-Japanese reading) and harakiri is the opposite, 腹切り (the first character is "stomach"; the pronunciation is "kuny", a purely Japanese reading). The Japanese use of the word "harakiri" is colloquial and has some pejorative connotations: while "seppuku" refers to a ritual suicide, "harakiri" is more commonly translated as "to gut yourself with a sword"(source unlceded 297 days).
I didn't count it, to be honest. I just simulated it a few times in Excel. Yes, the drawdowns are significant, which is why I didn't like the system at the time. On the other hand, drawdowns can be reduced (by reducing profitability as well). In short, it's a double-edged sword, but it has some potential.
Initial deposit 1000$. Initial lot 0.03 + MM. Time interval 01.01.09 - 16.03.10. Expected payoff is $5.99. Maximum lot position on this time interval turned out to be 2.16. Maximum drawdown is large - $6842. But it is not a hindrance for fans of casinos. Just to wait for the doubling of the deposit. After the withdrawal of its money the initial lot can be increased, although I would not.
I am not going to sell the Expert Advisor. I am posting data solely for inspiration forum users.