[Archive!] Pure mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc.: brain-training problems not related to trade in any way - page 263
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Поправил.
Mm-hmm.
Yeah, I really blew it with a nine. I should have written -16, then I would have scored 32 at the end.
TheXpert, требую ответ про семь сигарет :)
he still eatsTheXpert, требую ответ про семь сигарет :)
I can do eight. Six in a circle + two on the ends. ;Р
I can do eight. Six in a circle + two on the ends. ;Р
What do you mean, six in a circle? Each one has to touch each one.
TheXpert, demand an answer about seven cigarettes :)
MetaDriver wrote(a) >>
I can do eight. Six in a circle + two on the ends. ;Р
Maximal number is 12. Can't you do it?
А максимум вапче 12. Слабо сделать?
You can also have 20. You take the pack and put it in the meat grinder. // I didn't grind it!!! I didn't mince it!!!
And the maximum is 12. Can't you do it?
A drawing, please. I can't imagine. Each one has to touch each one.
Рисуночек пожалуйста. Не могу представить. Каждая должна касаться каждой.
Reread the condition. Sorry. I misunderstood the first time I read it. It seemed to me that you have to make a stack in which each touches the maximum number of neighbours (any neighbours).
In my version of the interpretation, you can lay out "crystal structures". Which I did.
Anyway, I get it, MetaDriver.
To be honest, I'm not very good at these games. I knew the strategy of the second one, and I still don't know the first one. But you helped me out. You had to put -18 after my +17.
I spurred the game on purpose and didn't know who would make the bigger mistake. I'm sure I had mistakes too.