An interesting game - who can understand from transaction history how an advisor works - page 3

 
TEXX >> :

That's exactly what you want! Throw in the state, see what a cunt my advisor is,

and if you wanted to be specific, you could have thrown in the code and asked the forum people's opinion,

but this is pure P.R.R.R. !!!!!!!!!!

I knew it wouldn't come without... Code? I'm not in the habit of sharing my top tips, sorry, so I'm greedy. If you like to think it's PR, so be it. I don't care.

 
sanctus >> :

Wrong again) The first thing that should catch your eye in the steute is the absence of any fixed goals.

>> so we're guessing yes no.

--

will you respond to attempts at guessing ?

 
sanctus писал(а) >>

I knew it wouldn't come without... Code? I'm not in the habit of sharing my top tips, sorry, so I'm greedy. If you like to think it's PR, so be it. I don't care.

Okay, if it's a game and not PR, what's the PRIZE ??? !!!!!!!!!

I think that's fair enough.

 
YuraZ >> :

So we're guessing yes. No.

--

will you answer the guessing game?





I will, and with explanations and comments.

 
TEXX >> :

OK, if it's a game and not PR, what's the PRIZE ??? !!!!!!!!!

I think it's fair.

The prize is whoever comes up with the right version will know it's right. And maybe get a completely free code to make it better together.

 
sanctus писал(а) >>

The prize is that whoever comes up with the right version will know it's the right one. And maybe get a totally free code to make it better together.

Had a long laugh. :))))))) THANK YOU!!! Especially liked the last sentence.

Good luck.

 
Now someone has benefited from my theme, prolonging their life)
 
I think the basis is a return to the broken extremum on the lower TF (M1-M5) and entry into trading on the broken direction, the so-called traders' remorse
 
REXX >> :
I think the basis is a return to the broken extremum on the lower TF(M1-M5) and entry into trading on the broken direction, so called traders' remorse

It's warm, but not hot yet. The principle itself is kind of... more global, yet completely specific (in the intelligent sense) and simple.

 

Is the method linear? Or is it some kind of neuro?

Z.I. After reading TEXX's and REXX's comments, I was reminded of a Soviet cartoon about Oh and Ah.)