Signs of a REAL system - page 13
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
You can start your own thread and speculate in it about consistency or non-systemicity :)
I just want to collect in one place a list of failures at which "the car won't go". No sciency, philosophy and flooding - just a list
You've raised an interesting question, but don't impose your answers to your question, moreover to use a word flood.
100% sure!
Correctness is the pliiz criterion(s) of evaluation!
And also the timing of correctness...
Sometimes they say that a day feeds a year.
Is it right?
In terms of correctness?
I think the answer to this question is purely on the topic of this thread.
I am interested in the simplest first level: if the condition is met - the system is wrong, i.e. it is (almost) sure to lose a real deposit, no matter how nice pictures the tester draws.
I am interested in the simplest first level: if the condition is met - the system is wrong, i.e. (almost) for sure it will lose a real deposit, no matter how beautifully the tester draws pictures.
So, what about stability?
I guarantee you that you will get into trouble. Martingale will show everyone, you just need time again.
Signs of a wrong system: trying to build a TS on a process that is known to be unprofitable.
The signs of a good system: building an instrument that exploits the fact that the price is random, or it does not care about randomness.
Did I mention the word martin? I categorically do not like martingale and all its derivatives...
That's not what I was talking about.
Too bad I'm not hosting such a vivid discussion, I'm very busy today :(
Did I mention the word martin? I categorically dislike martingale and all its derivatives...
That's not what I was talking about.
Too bad I can't take such a vivid discussion, I'm very busy today :(
It's not the martin you're thinking of, and it's all about the same, the essentials.
>>so what about sustainability?
>> Resistance to what? The vonWiner signal?
I am interested in the simplest first level: if the condition is met, the system is wrong, i.e. it is (almost) certain to lose a real deposit, no matter how nice pictures the tester draws.
First we need to determine what we are discussing: a device that can be ridden for money or a bunch of engines to such a device. I think the correct TC is one that has the principle of systematicity and have clarified what I mean by that. This is not news to Metastock users. Among the mentioned attributes of systematicity I didn't mention the requirement of adaptivity, and this requirement practically nullifies any "overoptimization". If you think the wrong system is the requirement for testing, your right. I stated above that "fit" is an empty sounding thing that says nothing.
I just want to collect in one place a list of faults in which "the car doesn't go".
No way!!!!
First you have to get in the car and only then understand if it's OK or not!!!
It's not the martin you're thinking of, and it's all about the essentials.
How do you even know what it's about?
I was actually referring to virtual trading... No martins!!!!