Which is easier - a steady 500 pips a month or just 20? - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
...
then ran it with a take 20 and a stop 20
...
Look for a TS that has a stop = 0...
20 is easier than 500
but 500 is better than 20.
What's not to understand?)
Look for a TS which has a stop = 0
I mean no stops at all :)
>> Good idea.
In fact, it would be better to set the take and stops not in pips, but in coefficients.
Example:
I mean no stops at all :)
That's a good idea.
No it's not. Stop is virtual and it's equal to 0. So we have to look for a TP which does not lose one pip after entering the trade.
20 is easier than 500
but 500 is better than 20.
What's not to understand ))
Yeah, right, what's not to understand. You are ready to argue with you though:
NikT_58 wrote(a) >> 500 is easier but not interesting.
I'd do the same uninteresting trading myself... Why, it's up to the bot to trade, not me.
In fact - this is the second point of view, that 500 is easier than 20.
No, it's not. Stop is virtual and it equals 0. So, we have to look for a TS which does not lose one pip after entering the trade.
Are there situations (which can be predicted somehow), in which the price by a series of consecutive ticks moves much larger distance than the spread? 0о
And are there often situations (which can still somehow be predicted) in which the price in a series of successive ticks moves a significantly greater distance than the spread? 0о
Well the mathematician wrote that once a month is enough ). Although the history shows many more entry points than once a month. The main thing is to learn to recognize them
Yeah, right, what's not to understand. You're a betting man, though:
I'd be just as uninterested in trading myself... Why, it's still for the bot to trade, not me.
In fact - this is the second point of view, that 500 is easier than 20.
If you follow this logic, for example 12500 ( twelve thousand five hundred ) stable pips is even easier than 20 and not more interesting because your conscience is starting to bother you that you're stealing candy from the child (from Forex).