Crisis: Don't we care? - page 72
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
sol писал(а) >>
In general, it is very interesting to watch the war between the two ideological firmware.
Like robots, really. They have programmed them to throw stones at each other and there is no stopping them.
For those who like google and think MACY FOUNDATION.
P.S. In general, the causes of the crisis are in people's minds and the solution should be sought there.
Fondness for google and to think is also "firmware".
The ideal state is a state of thoughtlessness.
Fondness for google and thinking is also 'firmware'.
The ideal state is a state of thoughtlessness.
~
Sorry, no fighting. :))
I just remembered: in August I listened to Latynina's comments and was shocked that she involuntarily called
I just remembered in August and was shocked when I listened to comments made by Latanina and was shocked when she accidentally called our fighters "they" and "those" and the Georgian side respectfully. Even the liberal forum of Ekho blew up.
After that I am not interested in her facts, I am disgusted.
(without fighting and whispering)
On her way out of the studio Venediktov was waiting for her with a mute question in his eyes, and after a short question, followed by -
"Did I say that? What a fool... "
Later there was a conversation between Venediktov and VVP.
I think this is a forgivable fault for live TV, though it leaves a residue
"how to get a cat to eat mustard"
http://www.dni.ru/economy/2009/2/3/158588.html
(C) The EU ambassador to the United States, John Bruton, said adopting the plan in this form threatened global free trade standards. "We see this idea as a very dangerous precedent at a time when the world is facing an economic crisis," the ambassador said, adding...
In general, the causes of the crisis are in the human mind...
After reading this thread, I'm afraid no one will have any doubts about it)
***
"To my grandfather's village..."
This is a real squabble... Guys, there are no enemies here, here are friends and colleagues, in the "worst case" competitors, if someone's opinion contradicts even the majority opinion, it does not mean that it should be delivered "anathema", that person deserves respect at least for the courage to express and defend their position. Alternative views are necessary. Truth is born in an argument, not a fight. It is better to back up your opinion with an argument than brand your opponent with unflattering epithets. I would also gladly throw a rotten tomato or a shoe at those responsible for the crisis, or those whom we consider to be such, but they are not here) Even in spite of the sharpness and sensitivity of the topic, get wound up and move to the individual. Peace. Hope to be understood and heard)
In general, the causes of the crisis are in the human mind...
"The director said at a meeting that there is no crisis, it is only in the heads. After which he reduced the herd."
It would be funny if it was just a joke.
You said, and I quote: " Thevery scheme that has been developed and justified by all sorts of Nobel Prize winners, developers of mathematical models of famous derivatives, justifiers of the fact that crisis is impossible. "
The thesis that a crisis is impossible is idiotic by definition, to attribute an idiotic statement to a third person is to make him look like an idiot.
From your phrase it follows:
1. there are many such idiots among Nobel laureates, which, as you later admitted, is a lie. According to your own words there was only one. That is, you deliberately insulted people you don't know and respect.
2. you have not provided evidence that even that one received a nobel prize for arguing the impossibility of a crisis.
How dearly you reveal yourself in your quote !
My phrase is solely a listing of the facts of the involvement in the known scheme of certain representatives of science (and not, as you wrote - all in general, dozens or hundreds). Emotionally it implies only my scepticism about their scientific results.
And then there are your speculations and emotional responses. In particular, the word "idiot" and its variations appear 4 times in 2 sentences. Yes and everything else is just your "logical" constructions and your claims.
Interestingly, I've actually made a lot of points in my posts. But you've found nothing but this ridiculous excuse to pick on to write anything meaningful on the topic. From my point of view it shows that your inner state is quite contradictory. There seems to be some kind of collapse of ideas, hopes, values. But it's hard, unwilling or impossible to admit it. So you rush to fight with anyone who, willingly or unwillingly, happens to be on the side of this collapse. So you're not fighting me. You're not defending the honour of the laureates. It is you who are trying to convince and reassure yourself that what is collapsing now is in fact true and everything will be restored. That's right, fight. Until a man pays with his own blood, until his head is bruised, until his bones are broken, he will not change his way of thinking for anything.
The peculiarity of the Nobel prizes in science is that they are awarded much later than the discovery or the work is done. The Nobel committee waits for time to show whether a discovery is truly significant or not. CDOs have been on the market for over 20 years and have been used successfully in finance. It is a great tool that has served and continues to serve people and the economy well. For the last 5 years there has been a skew in their use, there have been many mistakes and kinks. This has led to serious problems.
Some time ago I did a research on different types of CDOs and the causes of the sub-prime crisis. The real reasons go back to the Twin Towers tragedy. Nobody has ever said that a crisis is impossible. On the contrary, the current crisis is a delayed crisis from 2001. The U.S. was able to extinguish and prevent that crisis, but it has paid off today.
I am waiting for you to give me the facts about the laureate who proved the idiotic idea that the crisis is impossible - or take it back.
You wait. And just so you're not bored, I'll tell you something else. There were two laureates. There's only one Nobel Prize. You get it?
By the way, with your post you confirmed what I wrote above. The problem is not the fellow scientists, but who and how uses their achievements. This is the generalised cause of the crisis - big capital, using its financial power, pocket power, apparatus of analysts-experts-scientists, investment banks, rating agencies and so on, has built a gigantic financial pyramid, which could not help but collapse. Just like everything else that big capital builds. Alas, such are the laws of capitalism.
And everything you wrote about the twin towers is (sorry) baby talk.
However, it is your point of view on the subject, which means there is at least something to discuss. It's better than ridiculous claims.
By the way, for anyone who wants to delve deep enough into the causes and mechanism of the crisis, Kobyakov and Hazin's book "The Decline of the Dollar Empire and the End of Pax Americana".
With a huge amount of facts, names, charts and references. The book was published in 2003, so you could say a prediction that came true.
I personally do not agree with the authors' ideas of what and how things will be after the crisis. However, the analysis and methodology itself is at a good professional level.
By the way, for anyone wishing to delve deeply enough into the causes and mechanism of the crisis, Kobyakov and Hazin's book "The Decline of the Dollar Empire and the End of Pax Americana".
There are not enough illustrations in the archive, you can see them here.