History repeats itself - a lie? - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
And that too, not always.....
This phrase should be the first postulate of those analyses. I wonder if anything can be said about price changes by using the word "always" in the phrase without the particle "not"?
This phrase should be the first tenet of tech analysis.
Well not always )))) either. There was a nice head and shoulders on the pound not long ago )))). Repeated exactly by the technical analysis )))))
Well not always )))) either. Here was a nice head and shoulders not long ago on the pound )))) Repeated exactly by the tehanalysis )))))
ah, others...
i remember, someone from the local "greats" liked to catch the pioneers and ask - show me one divergence that has not worked! :-) needless to say there is no benefit to anybody from such self-assertion, right?
A little remodelling of the advisor
If history didn't repeat itself, neural networks wouldn't work :)
One does not follow from the other at all )). It depends on what kind of neural networks and how you use them ))
This phrase should be the first postulate of those analyses. I wonder if you can say anything about price changes by using the word "always" in the phrase without the particle "not".
I can, but it does not come up right away. I'm sorry. Always - the price moves. And if it moves, it has all the attributes of movement. And we must analyze the parameters of this movement. Nobody cancelled grandfather's law.
changed a little more and on the same period:
changed a little more and on the same period:
This is, of course, all great. As I understand it, this is on the optimisation period. What about the OOS? )))
Here's more on the same point:)))