Traders Forum - page 2
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
but the subject of code protection is interesting in itself. who knows how many days a global variable stores data?
MQL documentation knows
But the subject of code protection in itself is interesting. Who knows how many days a global variable stores data?
Strangely enough, it's right there in the manual - https://docs.mql4.com/ru/globals
Global variables exist in the client terminal for 4 weeks after the last access, after which they are automatically deleted. An access to a global variable is not only setting a new value, but also reading the value of the global variable.
a it's not that hard, you spend a few months on the forum and a general impression of "who's who" emerges...
Of course it's not difficult. You just have to spend a few months reading everything you can get your hands on. That's all there is to it....))))))))))))))))))))
i.e. you can simply put a limit on the number of trades in a global variable? (I mean the demo versions)
Of course it's not difficult. You just have to spend a few months reading everything you can get your hands on. That's all there is to it....))))))))))))))))))))
No, read only what YOU are interested in, smart people usually know a little bit about everything, and blabbermouths always know EVERYTHING.
i.e. you can simply put a limit on the number of trades in a global variable? (I mean the demo versions)
"Why is it that some people get everything and others get nothing?" exclaimed Kamil from "Election Day", staring painfully at the vodka.
What do you think of the 'code protection' thread? A discussion on market mechanisms started there, but as soon as I tried to figure it out, all the participants disappeared.
Let's track them down and bring them back to the thread so we can get to the truth together!
A discussion on the multiplication table has begun. You tried to figure out what 7x8 equals. I told you 56. I have spent the time, effort and money to buy an arithmetic book, read it and learn the multiplication table by heart. And you're offering me your vision. I'm not interested. And I'm not interested in retelling the textbook and arguing why 7x8=56.
What's going on? Every topic is a superficial opinion.
I have to agree. You wanted to discuss market mechanisms. Which of the classic works on financial market theory did you study before starting this discussion in order to avoid superficial opinions in your statements? Not the books that talk about easy and guaranteed money, but the ones that talk about the impossibility of making money on the exchange. As the situation looks somewhat unequal, I give you an extract from a textbook, and you give me your opinion based on an empty shell. The discussion should be mutually beneficial, mutually enriching. Your ideas are of no value to me, therefore I have withdrawn from further discussion.
"Why is it that some people get everything and others get nothing?" exclaimed Kamil from the Election Day movie, staring painfully at the vodka.
:)) Yes...
2 protection seekers - gentlemen, the task of creating a reliable (at least a bit :)) ) of software protection from illegal copying is much harder than figuring out Forex... When you figure it out or someone tells you how to do it, you'll be richer than Billy... :)) And forex will be ridiculous to you.