Scold :) Interested to hear your opinion regarding... - page 12
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
2 Vita
I like your approach, I have a similar point of view.
It would be interesting to add something to that about how to determine whether a TC gives a statistical advantage and, if so, how to calculate it.
What's up, barada?
Интересно было бы к этому еще добавить что-нибудь о том, как определить дает ли ТС статпреимущество и, если дает, то как его посчитать.
I support you, I would be very interested to hear your thoughts/assumptions/confirmations on this
As far as I understand, it's a scolding thread)
I'm posting the EA's stats:
On a fixed lot
2 Vita
I like your approach, I have a similar point of view.
It would be interesting to add something to that about how to determine whether TC gives a stat advantage and, if so, how to calculate it.
You can add sl/tp - 50/50 on the minimum distance allowed by the BC, it is logical that if there is a statistical advantage then profitable trades will be more than 50%
And this is with a very aggressive MM:
As far as I understand, it's a scolding thread)
I'm posting EA's stats:
Why are you posting it? Do you need to scold? What's there to scold? 82 trades in 4 years, 20 trades per year, nothing at all...
Good question.
Generally a branch of good questions :)
Figar0
How many deals do you think there should be and why?
ZS: I didn't get into the stats above, I just liked the question.
Good question.
Generally a branch of good questions :)
Figar0
How many deals do you think there should be and why?
ZS: I didn't go into the stats above, I just liked the question.
It does not matter how many deals if you know how the result is obtained, 10 is enough for forward to think about a probable pattern. In this case, no one knows how this result was obtained, it is logical to assume the usual wrong one - the result of optimization, but it is worth nothing for such a great number of deals. That is all.
Why are you posting this? Do you need a scolding? What's there to scold? 82 deals in 4 years, 20 deals a year, nothing at all...
No, it's not. Imagine, it was written for something. The testing on a demo for 3 months will yield an average of 5 deals, on the basis of which conclusions should be drawn about the system's performance and should be sent for real trading... But everything is not so beautiful on the real account as on the optimized history and a 76% drawdown is equal to a failure.