Predicting the future with Fourier transforms - page 33
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Colleagues, have you still not understood with whom you are "arguing" here?
There was, is and will be only ONE person on this forum who knows about Fourier, Kalman and other complicated things and yet makes three mistakes in the word "yuck" (deliberately, makes a fool of himself).
This is SProgrammer, a Goldman Sachs / CIA Cossack. That's his job. He has to sniff out what he knows without giving up what he knows.
SProgrammer is not Trololo, that's for sure! But still, vigilance is necessary. Do not pass important information here. Only through private and that... Better in words than in writing anything.
There is a solution based on the Fourier transform. It's simply elegant and beautiful, but it requires a lot of code. I only have half of it. I don't have time to finish it all.
That's it, Vadim, you're hooked. The best banks in the world will be fighting over you, get ready.
No way! I haven't done anything yet :-))
The banks have access to the orders of the big participants. They don't need all our technical tricks.
SProgrammer is not Trololo, that's for sure! But still, vigilance is essential. Don't hand over important information here. Only via private message and that's it. Better in words than in writing anything.
There is a solution based on the Fourier transform. It's just elegant and beautiful, but it requires a lot of code. I only have half of it. I don't have time to finish it all.
It seems to me that graceful and beautiful is when a couple of lines of code in the solution).
And here, ideally, there's an infinite amount of code, or an infinite loop... while the solution is a choice among many solutions
IMHO.
SProgrammer is not Trololo.
Alexei, this is no joke. Indeed there are such technologies.
FTP again:
Address: ftp://ftp.zhunko.ru
user: zhunko_Guest
password: abd4vsuc
There's an archive with all sorts of stuff collected on the Internet by good people. Recently updated due to new successes of Dinatron (Sergey). I advise to take a look. I haven't seen any simpler device for radiant energy catching. But I would make it more reliable. He published the schematic. And he explained the directions of improvements.
There is also a theoretical justification of such movements in the archive. Modern technologies make it possible.
There's also antigravity and various free energy sources in the archive.
Disseminate the archive and the link to it as widely as possible. The more people know about it and do something with it, the sooner we will be done with non-suckers.
Vadim! The key element of the Dynatron "devices" (oh dear, the name) is the ground, from which the high-frequency noise is caught. Remove it and the system is dead. The single-wire resonant line is a well-known phenomenon, not at all mystical, perfectly explained by traditional physics of electromagnetism and successfully used in practice.
So, even if we do away with midgets, somebody will have to pump "radiant energy" into Mother Earth after all (I suppose it will be the same midgets, but they will be stoking on diesel generators in secret bunkers so as not to betray the terrible secret).
Vadim! The key element of Dynatron "devices" (oh dear, the name) is grounding, from which the high-frequency noise is caught. Take it away and the system is screwed. The single-wire resonant line is a well-known phenomenon, not mystical at all, well explained by traditional physics of electromagnetism and successfully used in practice.
So even if we do away with the subhumans, someone will still have to pump "radiant energy" into Mother Earth (I suppose it will be the same subhumans, but they'll be fuming on diesel generators in secret bunkers so as not to give away the terrible secret).
You're a little out of touch. There's nothing to do with high frequency vibrations from the ground. Figure it out. Build a circuit. You don't even have to build it. Just look at it. There's no EARTH!
He repeated Tesla's experience. He figured it out. It worked for me, too. When I was doing transmitters, I noticed that the power coming off the output sometimes exceeded the capacity of the power supply. No grounding! Now I understand why.
How's that? I can clearly see the grounding here(http://www.glubinnaya.info/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=4495&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=):
And anyway, if it all works out so great, why not test everything under normal laboratory conditions, with field measurements, not just voltage and current, energy calculations, etc. The key feature of any experiment is repeatability. Any result will be recognized only if it can be repeated independently hundreds or at least tens of times.
By the way, it is with calculations of energy parameters that the authors of such experiments most often make mistakes. The most widespread one is to multiply readings of ampere meter with voltmeter and to consider that the received figure is power. Well, who, pray tell, who told you that the current and voltage in your circuit are sinusoidal/constant? I'll answer: it probably isn't, especially with an arrester in place. Which means you have to measure I and U with an oscilloscope and integrate along the time axis. As a rule, when one does realise this, the dope comes out quickly, but not for everyone, yep...
In general, the conditions of "research" are staggering. I don't understand how science can be done in such conditions at all.