You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The title of the thread made me laugh... imagined a line of investors... and the author, I don't want your money :-)
On the merits... nonsense... no chance...
Joining in.... EDRUND....
Test it on the minutes... You'll get more or less true results. ... Good luck with that.
The title of the thread made me laugh... imagined a line of investors... and the author, I don't want your money :-)
On the merits... nonsense... no chance...
Joining in.... ERUNDA....
Test it on the minutes... You'll get more or less true results. ... Good luck...
Signals on higher timeframes are much clearer and more reliable, why sit through a lot of noise on the 15-minute or 15-minutes?
On higher timeframes, the tester tries to imitate quotes that do not really correspond to reality ... it's not there on the minutes... There is nothing for the tester to make up...
Signals on higher timeframes are much clearer and more reliable, why sit through the noise on the 15-minute or 15-minutes?
If 15 minutes is noise too, then I'm a Spanish pilot.
The signals on the higher timeframes are much clearer and more reliable, so why bother working with noise on 1-minute frames?
You have misunderstood the recommendation to do a test on the minutes. It's not about the timeframe. In your Expert Advisor, insert an additional option in external parameters - the timeframe size. i.e. instead of "0" - for example
ma=iMA(NULL, TIMEFRAME, MovingPeriod,1,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0);
Then set TIMEFRAME=60 (if your EA works with hours), but you should run it in the tester using tf=1min. And you will be happy... ..." and an objective result! Even if you use open prices...
This is why we should analyze the signals on higher timeframes.
You have misunderstood the recommendation to do a test on the minutes. It's not about the timeframe. In your Expert Advisor, insert an additional option in the external parameters of the indicators you use - the timeframe size. I.e. instead of "0" - for example:
ma=iMA(NULL, TIMEFRAME, MovingPeriod,1,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0);
After that set TIMEFRAME=60 (if your Expert Advisor works on the clock), but the Expert Advisor should be run in the Strategy Tester at timef=1min. "And you will be happy... ..." and an objective result! Even if we use opening prices...
A couple of days' worth of work on bugs for sure
This is why we should analyze the signals on higher timeframes.
You have misunderstood the recommendation to do a test on the minutes. It's not about the timeframe. In your Expert Advisor, insert an additional option in the external parameters of the indicators you use - the timeframe size. I.e. instead of "0" - for example:
ma=iMA(NULL, TIMEFRAME, MovingPeriod,1,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0);
After that set TIMEFRAME=60 (if your Expert Advisor works on the clock), but the Expert Advisor should be run in the Strategy Tester at timef=1min. "And you will be happy... ..." and an objective result! Even if we use opening prices...
I was rejoicing that the real profitability would be stable about 2! Was it all in vain? Can you please explain why the result is worse on the minutes?
These price trends have a lot more accurate and reliable, so why should we look at the noise on the 1-minute timeframes?
You have misunderstood the recommendation to do a test on the minutes. It's not about the timeframe. In your Expert Advisor, insert an additional option in the external parameters of the indicators you are using - the timeframe size. I.e. instead of "0" - for example:
ma=iMA(NULL, TIMEFRAME, MovingPeriod,1,MODE_SMA,PRICE_CLOSE,0);
After that set TIMEFRAME=60 (if your Expert Advisor works on the clock), but the Expert Advisor should be run in the Strategy Tester at timef=1min. "And you will be happy... ..." and an objective result! Even if we use opening prices...
I was rejoicing that the real profitability would be stable about 2! Was it all in vain? Can you please explain why the result is worse on the minutes?
I don' t know why the result is worse on the minutes ?