Alternative implementations of standard functions/approaches - page 5
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The i-Series functions that have appeared recently are written in MQL? And when compiling, they embed their MQL-sources (like mqh) for more efficient compilation?
How is this possible without #include ?
These are not fundamental features of the implementation at all.
The i-Series functions that have appeared recently are written in MQL? And when compiling, do they embed their MQL sources (like mqh) to compile more efficiently?
No, of course not.
No, of course not.
Then please clarify these sentences
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and testing of trading strategies
Alternative implementations of standard functions/approaches
Renat Fatkhullin, 2018.06.09 17:10
We returned to the idea of embedding the mass of simple system functions natively in the resulting MQL5 code, which allowed us to speed them up a lot by using them in the global optimization of the resulting code.Then please clarify these sentences
Not sure myself - let's wait for implementation, there will probably be an explanation.
I think adding these functions to Five is not a priority at all. Except for iBarShift, which is really indispensable, in terms of efficiency. For all the rest, the existing self-written analogues are not inferior in performance. So what is the point of wasting time and resources on this. After all, there are much more necessary things for programmers that are missing in the language itself.
the available self-written equivalents are not inferior in performance.
Even the analogues vary greatly in terms of performance. The number of people who can write them or find them is less than a percentage of the users.