What happened to the rating of programmers in Freelance?

New comment
 

Apparently something changed in the site engine today.
In terms of sorting by programmer rating in Freelance.
Not by number of completed jobs, not by time of last job, by average amount, by average deadline.
Programmers are scattered haphazardly.

https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/developers

Developers, please explain - what is the sorting principle now?

 
Yes, it's a shame to drop out of the top ten to page two
 

Ball rating rules ).

ZS: does anyone else remember its essence ))))

 

I see a systematic way of rating: fast-expensive

+ most likely sorting by reviews, and activity or recent activity

+ number of rejected works

 
Alexandr Bryzgalov:
I see a systematic way of rating: fast-expensive
So MetaQuotes are better off with such performers, so they raise them? )))))))))
No... you must be joking ))))
 
Andrei Fandeev:
So MetaQuotes are better off with such performers, so they raise them? )))))))))
Nah... you must be joking ))))
The cost of the work in the ranking should help to increase the price in freelancing, and this is beneficial to Metaquotam.
 
Alexandr Bryzgalov:

+ most likely sorting by reviews, and activity or last activity

No. Clearly the top ones have fewer stars than those below.
The last activity checked, it doesn't fit either.
 
rather quicker-cheaper
 
Alexandr Bryzgalov:
Taking the cost of work into account in the ranking should help to increase the price in freelancing, and this benefits Metakvotam.
Here for example Ahmed Kadri has an average cost of 102. average deadline of 1 day. And he's at the bottom of the page....
Nope, doesn't fit either )))
 
Andrei Fandeev:
No. Clearly the top ones have fewer stars than those below.
Checked the latest activity, doesn't fit either.
arbitrage and overdue
 
I think there's a rating system in the workplace, so maybe that's where it came from.
12345678
New comment