You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
What don't you like about this range?! What do you think it should be? And why can't someone else demand that it be changed in the same way?
You change your opinions and demands to the exact opposite almost every day.
I have explained that with protection, it can be freely accessed, without protection, only in the hands of a trusted person.
If it is freely accessible, who will make the table? You do not trust me, you do not trustKhatimlianskii either. What is your problem with testing algorithms without restrictions in the hands of a trusted tester?
Take it easy.
All right, let's have this range.
It's no big deal.
I have no reason to trust you or any other user I don't know.
I don't think this is a sign of paranoia. Just common sense.
However, if a person is trusted by the majority, I will trust him too.
OK!
I think when all the technical issues are sorted out, some will come up.
Library issues with the FF, connection interface issues - all of that should be perfectly clear.
For example: is it possible to implement the solution in a script, or only in the library?
If only in a library, who will write the script that calls it, etc...
I think when all the technical issues are sorted out, people will come forward.
The questions of the library with the FF, questions of the connection interface - all this should be perfectly clear.
For example: is it possible to implement the solution in a script, or only in a library?
If only in the library, who will write the script that calls it, etc...
Nothing has changed, everything remains as before.
Ok.
But the question of a candidate for the role of tester remains open.
OK.
But the question of a candidate for the role of tester remains open.
Maybe a tester won't be needed, I think I've figured out how to protect the algorithm without limiting the parameters.
Great, but do we still need a referee to generate the key?
In general, I propose the following protection: the algorithm should check the date and check whether there is a connection to the broker's server(any).
In this way, a "trial" period can be set up for the testing period, e.g. 3 days from the day of publication. Thus, algorithms of all participants can be posted in the public domain and everyone can run a test on an FF prepared by a neutral person. In this case, there are no restrictions on FF parameters on the one hand, but on the other hand, it will provide a really open and transparent contest.
Are there ways to bypass such protection and use the algorithms after the trial period expires?
But still, someone will have to compile the test results into a table. I can do that. Anyone else can additionally compile a table of results and publish them.
Are there ways to bypass such protection and use the algorithms after the trial period has expired?
Buy an MT server ;)
Bind yourself to MQ-Demo additionally.