I divide traders into three categories. 1- Beginners (schoolchildren and oligarchs can be there). 2- The smart (programmers and technicians). 3- Fools (the rich looking to make a fortune). - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The difference is that now the work is for sale. This was not the case on the 4pc.
I have already seen my ideas executed by others in the marketplace.
The generation of ideas now turns only to achieving its own result without publicity
And even the latter is halted, for the journey is over.
1. Why are they gone? They just didn't, that's all? That's what I think the reasons are.
2. The codobase is bloated with clones of shabby ideas. I cannot build a working TS on these indicators, or I have not looked too hard.
I will always try to implement my probability of a market breakthrough.
4. If you are an MQL forum you cannot do it, everything is erased and smart guys are banned. Here is the result.
1. Someone understood something and left. Someone was drowned.
2. Yes. No thoughts of their own, only twists and turns. Fischer alone, he's already got like 20 names.
3. There's a big confusion between out-of-the-box creative thinking and the usual nonsense.
4. Why is it impossible? On the 4th, it was at one time.
The difference is that now the work is for sale. This was not the case on the 4pc.
I have already seen my ideas executed by others in the marketplace.
The generation of ideas now turns only to achieving its own result without publicity
And even the latter is halted, for the journey is over.
100++++++...
It's impossible to build a working TS on these indicators, or I haven't looked hard enough.
bad.... it is possible to build a profitable TS on a single SMA (although I prefer still the EMA... idyl average)
moreover, I have come to the conclusion that other complicated tools work worse, like FRAMA, TEMA, TMA etc.
more complicated!=better....
and more often vice versa, because this makes the system extremely fragile, as well as in the process of building TS with each new parameter and option the probability of confusion and making a logical error increases exponentially...
I don't even use built-in GAs and always pick up parameters of indices only by eye, all the rest is blind fitting to the market...
traders also like to say - it's not the indicator, but how you're preparing it...
the more people focus on complicated tools, the farther from the truth...
all the pros say it in unison!!! But a beginner stupidly thinks he's the smartest, finds a smart super-profitable indicator or even funnier, an Expert Advisor, and becomes a lemon...
bad.... it's possible to build a profitable TS on a single SMA (though I prefer the EMA... the ideal average)
Moreover, I've come to the conclusion that other complicated tools work worse, like FRAMA, TEMA, TMA, etc.
more complicated!=better.... and more often vice versa, because it makes the system extremely fragile and also in the process of building a TS with each new parameter and option the probability of confusion and making a logical error
increases exponentially...
If you want to draw an optimistic trader, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the rules, and you've got to follow the market.
As for the other indicators, they don't change the indicator, they just adjust it blindly.
The more people focus on complicated tools, the farther from the truth...
And all the pros say it in unison!!! But the newcomer stupidly thinks he is the smartest, he will find a clever super profitable tool or an even funnier advisor and become a lemon...
bad.... it's possible to build a profitable TS on a single SMA (though I prefer the EMA... the ideal average)
Moreover, I've come to the conclusion that other complicated tools work worse, like FRAMA, TEMA, TMA, etc.
more complicated!=better.... and more often vice versa, because it makes the system extremely fragile and also in the process of building a TS with each new parameter and option the probability of confusion and making a logical error
increases exponentially...
If you want to draw an optimistic trader, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the rules, and you've got to follow the market.
As for the other indicators, they don't change the indicator, they just adjust it blindly.
The more people focus on complicated tools, the farther from the truth...
And all the pros say it in unison!!! But the newcomer stupidly thinks he is the smartest, he will find a clever super-profitable indicator or an even funnier advisor and become a lemon...
and here's one of my points in the notebook:
"You should always start with the simplest one. The system and the analysis tools must not be unnecessarily complicated.
bad.... it's possible to build a profitable TS on a single SMA (though I prefer the EMA... the ideal average)
Moreover, I've come to the conclusion that other complicated tools work worse, like FRAMA, TEMA, TMA, etc.
more complicated!=better.... and more often vice versa, because it makes the system extremely fragile and also in the process of building a TS with each new parameter and option the probability of confusion and making a logical error
increases exponentially...
If you want to draw an optimistic trader, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the market, you've got to follow the rules, and the probability of confusion and making a logical mistake increases exponentially.
As for the other indicators, they don't change the indicator, they just adjust it blindly.
The more people focus on complicated tools, the farther from the truth...
And all the pros say it in unison!!! But the newcomer stupidly thinks he is the smartest, he will find a clever super profitable tool or an even funnier advisor and become a lemon...