FOREX - Trends, forecasts and implications 2016 - page 1192

You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
I don't see any competition ... Just hidden advertising by dealers.
Greetings
You have 189 pages with 20 signals each, that's just MT4 signals, 9,890 products in the Market, no competition here.)
Greetings
189 pages with 20 signals each, that's just MT4 signals, 9,890 products in the Market, no competition here )
It's just visibility ... 90% of the products can be thrown in the trash ... They practically duplicate each other ... The signals are the same % .I.e., the % is stuffed with deposits and low maturity, so a simple slippage in the copying process kills profitability.
I have not understood the mathematical expectation.
not to cheat.
constant replenishments and cancellation of pending orders is not an example of trading for copying.
There are no regular deposits, investors in PAMM accounts are occasionally added, and cancellation of pending orders is done automatically by my advisor, it is not a crime that the price has not reached the right level. Profitability is almost 500% for such a short period, I thought it would attract people, but it is more complicated, and the PAMM accounts are not so popular...
how to add these numbers to get 238
We do not know the algorithm for their calculations, it means that there is a reason for these calculations. He said that they are dealing with it.
Maybe 90% of products in the market are almost identical. If so many developers, of whom at least 200 (a large number of them are very advanced) have not invented anything new, they will not. It turns out that 90% sell almost identical "potatoes" than there is no competition.
Nobody knows the algorithm of their calculations, so there is a reason for such calculations, but there is a thread here where they point to "suspicious signals". They're sorting it out there.
Maybe 90% of products in the market are almost identical. If so many developers, of whom at least 200 (a large number of them are very advanced) have not invented anything new, they will not. It turns out that 90% sell almost identical "potatoes" than there is no competition.
Nobody knows the algorithm of their calculations, so there is a reason for such calculations, but there is a thread here where they point to "suspicious signals". they've been dealt with.