FOREX - Trends, Forecasts and Implications 2015(continued) - page 541
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Feel better? =)
You're clueless)))
I asked for a screenshot in a couple of months, not one rectangle)
Yes, but ... hegets an answer and tries to explain))))), but he sends a message in a nice way))))
You're clueless)))
I asked for a screenshot for a couple of months, not a single rectangle)
he wrote - he's got intraday.
personally i've already stopped believing in intraday.... he's got a lot of luck. he's got a lot of luck. most likely it's self-deception and nothing more than a coincidence. it's like a casino game - $$$$$$ - jackpot.
// (I could go on for a month talking about the shoulder, minimum....) )))
He wrote - he's got intraday.
I personally have already stopped believing in intraday .... it's probably self-deception and nothing more than a coincidence, just like in the casino - a game of chance - $$$$$$ - jackpot
// (I could go on for a month talking about the shoulder, minimum....) )))
I asked for a screenshot with rectangles for a few months, what difference does it make to me how he trades, and that out of pure interest).
If they do not know what the price is, they do not know how to read it and then they do not know what to expect.
I asked for a screenshot with rectangles for a few months, what difference does it make to me how he trades, and that out of pure interest).
If he switches the TF to H1 and W1, he will show other rectangles.
If he switches over the timeframe from H1 to W1, it will show other rectangles, but what's the use? The price indicator is a price indicator anyway. But if the history would show trades like yours, then - "Yes", that's a great story!
I would show it too, but I do not even look at the price chart. Only when I'm spoiling it - I write an indicator or whatever I do to pass the time.
If it switches the TF from H1 to W1, it will show other rectangles, but what's the use? A price indicator is a price indicator anyway. But if the history showed deals like yours, then yes, that would be a great story!
You're clueless)))
I asked for a screenshot for a couple of months, not one rectangle)
I repent =) your favourite paras Funtik =)
(deleted)
for the last 2 weeks the data is hidden...
The point is that it doesn't have a price indicator.
he wrote - he's got intraday.
personally i've already stopped believing in intraday.... it's probably just self-deception and nothing more than a coincidence. it's like a casino game of luck - $$$$$$ - jackpot.
// (I could go on for a month talking about the shoulder, minimum....) )))
If you're alluding to books on me, you shouldn't. I am a practitioner, not a theorist. What I have not encountered (partly because of the fact that I can avoid such things, and that embracing the vastness is not one of my objectives) - I am not ashamed to confess.
You can talk about leverage for a month, like you're making a topic, but as long as you're saying that leverage, not lot, affects the point value, it's just idle chatter.
You're frustrated, as I understand it, that with giant leverage your dealer can change the leverage size at any(?) moment, but then why do you trade with such a dealer, and with such a giant leverage size
For example, with a leverage of 1:100 I have "voluntarily" compulsorily decreased it only to 1:50. But I was always warned about it, i.e. beforehand. Correspondingly I had enough time to make decisions (including sitting on the fence, if necessary, to skip this period).
I haven't seen any leverage higher than 1:25 for the ruble, if memory serves me correctly. But ruble trading is not for me (I avoid it). Accordingly, the subject of "voluntary" forced reduction of leverage is just not interesting to me. You, as far as I remember, have expressed a desire to get acquainted with this subject. And I sincerely wished you success.
P./S.: You, by the way, have not answered these questions posed to you, since you have touched upon the subject yourself. Instead you started jumping from one to another.
If you hint about books at me, it is in vain. I am a practitioner, not a theorist. I have not encountered (because, among other things, I may shun such things, and to grasp the immensity is not one of my objectives) - I am not ashamed to confess.
You can talk about leverage for a month, but as long as you keep saying that leverage, not lot, affects point value, it will only be idle talk.
You are upset, as I understand it, that with giant leverages your dealer can change the leverage size at any(?) moment, but then why do you trade with such a dealer, and with such a giant leverage size
For example, with 1:100 leverage I have "voluntarily" lowered it only to 1:50. But I was always warned about it beforehand, i.e. in advance.
If memory serves me correctly, I've never seen Ruble leverage higher than 1:25. But ruble trading is not for me (I stand aside). Therefore, the subject of "voluntary" forced reduction of leverage is just not interesting to me. You, as I remember, have expressed a desire to get acquainted with this subject. And I sincerely wished you success.
P./S.: You, by the way, have not answered these questions posed to you, since you have touched upon the subject yourself. Instead you started jumping from one to another.
О! Now the lot has already started to affect the point value....
I did not want to get acquainted with anything and do not take and do not need any successes.
They dropped the leverage on the ruble including open positions and widened the spread. No one wanted to die but the broker in the moment of lack of liquidity. That's the point of changing the leverage and not just on the ruble. Take their example and don't sweat the textbooks.