The axioms of financial market analysis (or the whole truth about the right and wrong use of indicators) - page 9

 
Useddd:

I'm not arguing that, in theory... In practice, by your logic, if demand/supply is the cause and price is the effect, then it is logical to think that analysis of the effects of a change in the cause comes earlier in time than the effects of a change in the effect, right? But the processes of cause and effect changes in time are instantaneous. So the consequences of each of them change synchronously in the future.

We live in the age of high technology. There are robots trading on stock exchanges. What is "instantaneous" for you is months and years for them :-D Naturally, it is news that comes first. The news produces a reaction, either to a statement or to the value of a predefined parameter. The reaction is reflected in an imbalance. For example, everyone begins to sell the Eurodollar in a split second. Consequently, its price changes - it goes down. Explain in more detail? ))
 
mmmoguschiy:
We live in the age of high technology. There are robots trading on stock exchanges. What is "instantaneous" for you is for them for months and years :-D Naturally, it is news that comes first. The news produces a reaction, either to a statement or to the value of a predefined parameter. The reaction is reflected in an imbalance. For example, everyone begins to sell the Eurodollar in a split second. As a consequence, its price changes - it goes down.

The news generates price spikes, those who bought or sold an instrument for serious money do not really care what the news is, as long as it is nothing major, e.g. England is washed away))))

The rules of trading have not changed for thousands of years, so technology is irrelevant.)

 
stranger:
A week to a month is the short term.
What's "long term" then? :-D
 
mmmoguschiy:
what is "long term" then? :-D
From six months.
 
stranger:
The news generates price spikes, those who bought or sold an instrument for serious money do not really care what the news is, if it's nothing big, e.g. England is washed away)))
So a non-farm or interest rate hike is just a peep? ))
 
mmmoguschiy:
So a nonfarm or interest rate hike in your understanding is so - pesky? ))
Do they cause the direction of travel to change? Never.
 
stranger:
From six months.
which terminal does such miracles happen? ))
 
stranger:
Do they change the direction of travel because of them? Never.
Because of the nonfarm - temporarily. Because of the interest rate - maybe, but over a slightly longer period. But what about the abolition of QE? Or the Eurofrank ceiling? ))
 
mmmoguschiy:
Because of the nonfarm - temporarily. From the interest rate - perhaps, but for a slightly longer period. But what about the abolition of QE? Or the Eurofrank ceiling? ))
Better not to trade with dwarfs, they just screw you)
 
mmmoguschiy:
We live in the age of high technology. There are robots trading on the stock exchanges. What for you is "instant" for them for months and years :-D Naturally, it is the news that comes first. The news produces a reaction, either to a statement or to the value of a predefined parameter. The reaction is reflected in an imbalance. For example, everyone begins to sell the Eurodollar in a split second. Consequently, its price changes - it goes down. Explain in more detail? ))
The news in most cases is already covertly and masked in the cause and consequently in the future consequence.
Reason: