The axioms of financial market analysis (or the whole truth about the right and wrong use of indicators) - page 10
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
agreed)))) overdid it here. Here, we come to the main point. The processes of moving the consequence of the cause through time are slower (though not uniform) than the processes of moving the consequence to change the consequence itself)))) oil, but still. The question is that changes in the consequence depend on changes in the cause, right? Therefore, it is possible to look for regions where the difference between changes of the consequence and changes of the cause is so big, that it allows to reconstruct changes of the cause + to have at this ability a certain inertia. That is why it is squeezed out of the price.
You propose to determine it not by the consequence, but by the consequence of the cause.
But in most cases, it seems to me, most of the time there is no difference in detection, i.e. the difference is not significant/fatal.
The plots are not always .
The news in most cases is already hidden and masked in the cause and consequently in the future consequence.
Forum on trading, automated trading systems and trading strategies testing
The axioms of analysis of financial markets (or the whole truth about right and wrong using indicators)
barabashkakvn, 2015.02.23 19:21
And preferably all axioms should be accompanied by figures and implementation in the form of MQL code. It would be great.In most cases the news is already hidden and masked in the cause and therefore in the future consequence.
It is more like this - there is an expectation - a projected value or a recent statement by the head of the National Bank or the Fed. The price is adjusted according to these expectations. What will happen in the end - no one can know except the insiders. When we find out about it, it is usually too late to play on it. So the question is - how to be among the first to know?
So if they are buying contracts, it's probably not to go for a loss? ))))))))))))))))))))))))))
That's enough to know)
It's all a question of options how to tell the difference between them or not in the general masses.
If there is demand, it is clear who.
What are we on this forum shouting about the pound? selling and competing to see who can name a lower target.
Who can pour $100-250bn every day for a week and a half in a row into buying the pound?
Confused in zeros, so right)))
If there is demand, it is clear who.
What are we on this forum shouting about the pound? sell and compete to see who can name a lower target.
Who can pour $10-25bn into buying every day for a week and a half in a row?
Whoever provides the liquidity of that currency
That's right, the Central Bank of England is mm on it)
Axiom number one : If you have to lose, you lose.
;)
Axiom number one : If you have to lose, you lose.
;)