MetaDriver: Well, well, that's fine as long as no one monopolises it. // For example, by buying up bitcoins on the root, like the Fed through its banks.
The signature is the stuff you encrypt sha (if I'm not mistaken). This can happen if for example you pass one nonce and encrypt another, as the most likely scenario.
TheXpert: The signature is the stuff you encrypt sha (if I'm not mistaken). This can happen if for example you pass one nonce and encrypt the other as most likely.
Well, well, that's fine as long as no one monopolises it. // For example, by buying up bitcoins on the root, like the Fed through its banks.
have you encountered this error?
{"success":0,"error":"invalid sign"}it appears when active orders are called, there are no signs in the parameters of this function
What does it want?
occurs when active orders are called, there are no signs in the parameters of this function
It says it's the wrong sign.
Yeah, it accepts, and then it stops, and then it stops again.
i wish i knew what he wrote, google translated it as a wrong sign ))
that's what it looks like:
The signature is the stuff you encrypt sha (if I'm not mistaken). This can happen if for example you pass one nonce and encrypt the other as most likely.
have you encountered this error?
{"success":0,"error":"invalid sign"}it appears when active orders are called, there are no signs in the parameters of this function
What does he want?
It wants your software to check the correctness of the signed hash of the message before it sends an electronically signed hash of the message.
I.e. somewhere there is a glitch in the software: either the hash of the signed message is calculated incorrectly or the digital signature.
He wants your software to check the correctness of the signed message hash before sending it.
So there is a glitch in the software somewhere: either the hash of the signed message is calculated incorrectly or the electronic signature.
and how often can you make requests to the server?