Service Work: Towards re-shaping the Top Developers towards professionalism - page 2

[Rustamzhan Salidzhanov]

abolk:For example, you can take into account the availability of articles from both 5k and 4k in the top (this will make the service accessible to the "old" professionals with 4k)

Hmm, I feel pretty good without it... ;)

[Anatoli Kazharski]

TheXpert:
What's the topic?

Breathing in the back. ))

[Renat Fatkhullin]

We plan to add a jobs tab to the meta-editor in the coming builds. It is true that this will work more in increasing the number of performers, but it will increase the volume and the customers.

[Alexey Topounov]

IgorM:

articles are different in content and in the presence of a professional approach to programming - there are outright amateurish examples, there are really examples for proper code development, imho, articles are absolutely no indicator

As for the proposal: need a differentiatedrate of time / money, then it will be seen who takes as complex orders and how fast they perform, for example, took 5 simple orders for $ 15 made for 2 days --> 48/75 = 0.64, took a cool order for $ 100 made a day, because there were ready to develop their performance indicator 24/100 = 0.24 . And there will be no desire to tire customers those developers who recruit a dozen orders, and will not have time. It seems to be all in praesnom - or quickly work or wait for an expensive order, or do not take orders that rating does not change

ZS:better so 48/75 = (1 - 0.64) *100% = 36% or 24/100 = (1-0.24) *100% = 76%, say work efficiency 76%

But it would be nice to develop this idea!

Also, it would be very useful to have several criteria for evaluating performers and the ability to sort performers by a single criterion, then there will be no clear top as such!

[TheXpert]

Imho, the number of jobs -- the most effective of the easy ones. Coupled with evaluation and feedback.

[Rustamzhan Salidzhanov]

Renat:
We plan to add a jobs tab to the meta-editor in the coming builds. It is true that it will work more to increase the number of performers, but it will increase the volume and the number of customers.

Renat, this is not a relevant question. We are discussing about Vin8 on the fourth forum. In the light of this publication: Windows RT through the eyes of a developer, I wondered how the company will manage the transition to RT platform?

[Andrey F. Zelinsky]

tol64:
Breathing on the back. ))

Another attempt to take the spotlight off my humble self.

I did some calculations in May. As of the 5th of May:

Collected statistics on each developer, who wrote how many articles and made publications in Kodabase.

It turned out that out of 87 participants Jobs service - 19 (22%) have articles and/or publications in Codabase;

Of the Top 10, only 2 have articles and/or publications in Codabase.

I entered the importance factor out of consideration:

- 1 job =1
- 1 job =50
- 1 codebase =1

and sorted again - and got a completely different Top:

---

# n/a	Nickname	Works	Articles	Code Base	Item No.n/a with coefficient of importance
70	GODZILLA	1	7	340	691
23	investeo	18	11	1	569
26	Integer	16	7	61	427
14	Dima_S	42	7	1	393
1	_Techno_	357			357
30	sergeev	9	6	6	315
34	Urain	6	6	3	309
3	avoitenko	136	3	3	289
2	abolk	200	1	21	271
51	ds2	2	4		202

---

If you look at the nicknames - you can clearly see that the content level is more adequate in terms of "professionalism and qualification".

So, about "staring me in the back" - a slip - I even by my own calculations roll back to the back of the top 10.

[Igor Makanu]

abolk: The "time/money" metric is fixated on the service and does not remove the contradiction of "Top through dumping, scooping".

yep, great dumping https://www.mql5.com/ru/job/6236

job: expert on parabolic and offers from developers for $50 and $30, how is it in Russian: "to make a quick buck from a sucker"?

anyone who writes on demand this work will do within an hour if not faster, who wants to try his hand at it for the first time - he will write within 1-2 days, but for the first to work for an hour on a ridiculous task - a large price, and the beginner does not ask so much

and you say dumping?

abolk:I introduced a coefficient of significance out of consideration:
- 1 job = 1
- 1 paper =50
- 1 codebase = 1 .

for what? personal reasons? )))))))))

for me, as a customer of experts, it makes more sense to look at it this way:

- 1 job = 1 - logical
- 1 article =0 - have not read and do not intend to
- 1 codabase =1 . - the case is dark, why do you publish profitable experts? or do you do plumers - do you work for dc?

[Andrey F. Zelinsky]

IgorM:

For what reasons? Personal reasons? )))))))))

There is an approach: "Expert judgement".

[Rustamzhan Salidzhanov]

Sometimes, and I know from personal experience, behind the sign "two parabolic" there is so much trouble... I can't believe it.