You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here's the right one.
Two.
Now it all adds up. I got two, too.
Anyway, how much is your accuracy? Up to five digits.
Now it all adds up. I got two, too.
In short, how much is your accuracy? Up to five digits.
I found a solution at 32.77856781 kilometers.
Yours hasn't counted yet. But it looks smaller. Initial angle of 30 degrees to the vertical?
I found the solution at 32.77856781km.
Yours hasn't been counted yet. But it looks smaller. An initial angle of 30 degrees to the vertical?
I'm about 30 to the horizontal. To the vertical it's 60.
The exact value of the minimum is very close to that figure.
It's strange why the optimum path is so ugly. Or we've found a sub-optimal one.
But this is not required in the problem, it is enough to find a path shorter than 32.
(A+I+B)-(A+B)=I First class, and you poll.
In short, how much is your accuracy? Up to five digits.
I have about 30 to the horizontal. To the vertical it is 60.
The exact value of the minimum is very close to this figure.
That's the strange thing about why the optimal path is so ugly. Or maybe we have found a sub-optimal one.
But this is not required in the problem, it is enough to find a path shorter than 32.
At thirty degrees : 10/sqrt(3)+2.5+5+3.1415*5*7/6 = 31.59891936
Taki fits.
That's the right one.
Yes, I've done something similar... But I can't get it below 32.8km...
That's the strange thing, why the optimal path is so ugly. Or maybe we found a sub-optimal one.
On the contrary beautiful :) Optimal stopudoff.
At thirty degrees : 10/sqrt(3)+2.5+5+3.1415*5*7/6 = 31.59891936
You're counting something wrong.
and where is the + and + :)))))
the first + and + have absorbed themselves and the third plus
+1 to you for the answer =)
On the contrary, it's beautiful :)
You're counting something wrong.