You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Please check EAs generated with weekly indicators, in particular with Accelereator. It does not work! This has been noted by me since the previous build (468).
Please check EAs generated with weekly indicators, in particular with Accelereator. It does not work! This has been noted by me since the previous build (468).
Additional question: Does it happen only in the tester?
So far I've only checked it in the tester. And those EAs that were compiled earlier (before 468 build) work (I haven't recompiled them).
So far I've only checked it in the tester. Moreover, those EAs that were compiled earlier (before 468 build) work (I haven't recompiled them).
Yeah, just checked with OnLine. Everything's fine there.
Mine only shows up in the tester. Looks like the tester doesn't want to pump up the extra history. We'll have to think about it.
Erm955:
Please check EAs generated with weekly indicators, in particular Accelereator. It does not work! This has been noted by me since the previous build (468).
It is the same with monthly indicators.
Erm955:
Please check EAs generated with weekly indicators, in particular Accelereator. It does not work! This has been noted by me since the previous build (468).
It's the same with monthly indicators.
Erm955:
Please check EAs generated with weekly indicators, in particular Accelereator. It does not work! This has been noted by me since the previous build (468).
It's the same with monthly indicators.
Why is the CExpertSignal class from the standard library declared like this in the Documentation,
and in the ExpertSignal.mqh file we see this declaration?Why is the CExpertSignal class from the standard library declared like this in the Documentation,
but in the ExpertSignal.mqh file we see such a declaration?