PLO. Application issues - page 19

[Yedelkin]

OK, I'll write that down: the design is acceptable. Thank you,marketeer, TheXpert!

[Stanislav Korotky]

TheXpert:

So that's exactly the problem with the questioner.

It's just the little things...

No, the question was how the "TimeCurrent()" function call was written without a semicolon immediately after it and it works. It was like this "CCC(void) : start(TimeCurrent();) {}" - as it is described in the documentation (I hadn't read it in this place, though ;-) ).

[Yedelkin]

marketeer:
... Like this "CCC(void) : start(TimeCurrent();) {}" - as it is written in documentation (I didn't read it in this place ;-) ).

:) https://www.mql5.com/ru/docs/basis/operators/expression

[Yedelkin]

papaklass:
 А разве в данной конструкции TimeCurrent() не является формальным параметром? 

Thank you, I've already realised from marketeer's input that I'm really slow. I myself use some functions as parameters for other functions. And I was confused by correct initialization of class members. I even sketched out the check code:

void OnStart()
  {

   class CCC
     {
   public:
      datetime          startCurrent,startServer;
                        CCC(void) : startCurrent(TimeCurrent()),startServer(TimeTradeServer()) {}
                       ~CCC(void) {}
     };

   CCC ccc;
   Print("startCurrent=",ccc.startCurrent);
   Print("startServer =",ccc.startServer);
  }