You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Here are more tests:
Profits match - 404.65
Before the tests, it's best to manually update the symbol history (Refresh command in the chart menu) - we're constantly correcting the chart history, so some users may have slightly different results due to unupdated history.
Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @2.40GHZ, 2047 MB, PR121
2010.09.26 16:56:07 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 2612012 ticks (138393 bars) generated within 8034 ms (total bars in history 144564)
how to pump up the history?
Profit match - 404.65
Intel Core2 Quad Q9505 2.83GHz, 3582 MB, PR112 W7 x32
2010.09.26 18:59:34 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 16286 ms (total bars in history 576660)
When I increased my bus speed from 333 to 400 3.4GHz PR134
2010.09.26 19:12:29 29 Core 1 EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 13104 ms (total bars in history 576660)
...
how to pump up a story
AMD Athlon IIX4 630, 2814MB, PR112
EURUSD,M1: 7143115 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 15678 ms (total bars in history 576660)
W7 x32 MT5 x32
Profit -404.65
Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz, 3574 MB, PR102 Windows XP
EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 38421 ms (total bars in history 576660)
It's strange that such a long generation time - and quite a decent PR. But I'm not in the know, I don't know essential factors of PR estimation :). And another thing: I have another ExpertMACD.
Intel Core2 Duo E7200 @ 2.53GHz, 3574 MB, PR102 Windows XP
EURUSD,M1: 7143130 ticks (212232 bars) generated within 38421 ms (total bars in history 576660)
Strange that such long generation time - and quite decent PR. But I'm not in the subject, I don't know the essential factors of PR estimation :). One more thing: I have another ExpertMACD Expert Advisor.
Yep....
P.S. papaklass resultis impressive))
P.S. papaklass resultis impressive))
All AMD XXX II seems to be very good pebbles. Our answer to Intel, so to speak, in the face of severe resource constraints.
Here's my iron:
The funny thing is that the performance on the 64 bit MT version was less than the 32 bit version, while the speed was higher, even though the processor is the same.
So far the difference between 32 and 64 bit MT is not as significant as I'd like it to be. I seem to have heard from the developers that no optimization has been done yet. Once it is done, the tester will work much faster.