Machine learning in trading: theory, models, practice and algo-trading - page 791
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Don't tell me it's real with a total duration of trade more than 3 months
Of course, this is a demo account ... Now we are testing a neural network P-Net, I have already written about it, it is a new development patented in the U.S. and Europe, unfortunately I can not disclose yet, but the roller, not yet commercial (not advertising).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY4tLXU5Rxc&t=265s
I liked it very much! No objections, corrections, changes.
Thanks for the effort, the world shone in new colors! Thank you!
I like it very much! No objections, corrections, changes.
Thank you for your work, the world shone with new colors! Thank you!
I don't recognize you. Are you really you or not you????
Of course, this is a demo account... Now we are testing a neural network P-Net, I have already written about it, it is a new development patented in the U.S. and Europe, unfortunately I can not disclose yet, here's just a video, not yet commercial (not advertising).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY4tLXU5Rxc&t=265s
I don't recognize you. Are you really you or not you????
I am. It's just if the ideas are genius, I'm not trolling. Tell me something else, please.
Here is the content of the article I want to write. the rest tomorrow, so I already have midnight...
Contents
Don't tell me that this is a real with a total duration of trade of more than 3 months.
There is no difference: real - not real. With adequate modeling and testing, the real is not much different from the test. In fact, the real is absolutely unnecessary for evaluating the system.
The whole question is about the adequacy of the model and the test.
There is no difference: real - not real. With adequate modeling and testing, the real is not much different from the test. In fact, the real is absolutely unnecessary for evaluating the system.
The whole question is the adequacy of the model and test to the real.
The reliable way to ensure the agreement between the real and the test is to work on the first bar without using zero. Checked it myself :-)
There is no difference: real - not real. With adequate modeling and testing, the real is not much different from the test. In fact, the real is absolutely unnecessary for evaluating the system.
The whole question is the adequacy of the model and test itself.
See
that's why it's not real
Here is the content of the article I want to write. the rest tomorrow, so I already have midnight...
Contents