Discussion of article "Brute force approach to pattern search" - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
That's odd. Why don't you consider the applied force as the source of the waves? A force applied to a string produces string oscillations and sound waves. I haven't read your book, but "the parameter "inducing behavioural amplitude" also raises strong doubts about its real-world applicability. I am not in favour of positivism, but I agree with the requirement of science that theory must be confirmed by experience. Therefore, I do not consider existing economic hypotheses to be science, and I am critical of any new "theories". The result from them is not even zero, but negative - loss of time and money.
There is no analogue of a string or anything to which forces can be applied in financial markets, so forces interact with each other.
As for the "stimulus amplitude" parameter, you are right to question it, it is a normal reaction to something new.
But the fact is that all this is already implemented (including in the indicator on this site, to find overbought/oversold zones, and much more accurately than using traditional indicators).
I didn't mean to offend anyone just that I saw roughly similar comments of yours in another article, not mine. You refer to a theory. I was wondering what this theory I immediately happy to read scientific reading and it is paid ) or maybe it is somewhere for free ? Give to read and if there is really something cool as I said I will write a robot and give 80 per cent of my profits that he will earn, and all the sources you will provide. Don't misunderstand. I also treat all forum members with great respect.
Eugene, write me your contacts (mail on my site) and I will send you a book in electronic form as a gift.
Well, you can not be so obsessive, at every occasion, mention your printed-unpaid-commercial labour :-)
There's no secret - the book was released back in late 2018 (the result of 10 years of research), and it's in the work of thousands of traders and analysts in many countries.
There is also no advertising - if I said Elliott Waves, then, following your logic, I would be advertising Elliott's theory?
Of course, what kind of advertising is that? I just go here and there and in between I mention that there is a certain theory, revolutionary and unique, in which this problem (substitute the name of the problem) is solved. But the only thing that is found at this request is the mcl forum and your site, and what is inside is not explained even in theses, everything is only for money. Thousands of traders, who are already familiar with the theory, are obviously all as one lurking and silent, not wanting to draw attention to such valuable and worthwhile information.
Eugene, write me your contacts (mail on my site) and I will send you the book in electronic form as a gift.
private_w.hudson@mail.ru
In the financial markets there is no analogue of a string or anything to which forces can be applied, so the forces interact with each other.
As for the "inducing amplitude" parameter, you are right to question it, it is a normal reaction to something new.
But the fact is that all this is already implemented (including in the indicator on this site, to find overbought/oversold zones, and much more accurately than using traditional indicators).
So you have force as some abstract mathematical concept that has no substrate (points of application, medium of distribution), linear and continuous?
"Nothing is new under the moon". "inducing amplitude" - amplitude of what?
I took a path that seemed easier to me. I developed a pattern that is always present, based on the statistical characteristics of the instrument. Therefore, I do not change it, but the scales on which it is present at the moment are constantly changing and floating in real time. So instead of looking for a pattern, I adjust the current scale to the already known pattern. As above I showed a sine wave that has a floating period and amplitude, here it reflects the meaning. The whole graph is presented in the form of some sort of sine wave, but with offsets relative to zero. Basically, I look for rising/falling half-periods of the sinusoid and further track the scale of this half-period, if the scale is growing, then positions are not opened, and further I trade for a reversal. In the future I plan to work on continuation, because it is essentially the same task.
Does each instrument have its own unique pattern or is there a set of elements that are more or less inherent to a particular trading instrument?
How many bars are needed to determine a scale change is a question of lag.
Of course, what kind of advertising is this? I just go here and there and in between I mention that there is a certain theory, revolutionary and unique, in which this problem (substitute the name of the problem) is solved. But the only thing that is found at this request is the mcl forum and your site, and what is inside is not explained even in theses, everything is only for money. Thousands of traders, who are already familiar with the theory, are obviously all as one lurking and silent, not wanting to draw attention to such valuable and worthwhile information.
The one who is hiding is the one who hides his name and tries to sling mud under a pseudonym, from under the covers, without knowing or understanding the content.
Besides, nobody prevents you from developing something of your own and showing us.
So you have force as some abstract mathematical concept that has no substrate (points of application, medium of propagation), linear and continuous?
"Nothing is new under the moon." "inducing amplitude" - amplitude of what?
Forces are, of course, contingent - they are price action "higher/lower" (bulls/bears). Encouraging amplitude is the amplitude of price in the form of an active impulse at the base of a trend, which most market participants perceive as the beginning of the trend.
The one who is hiding is the one who hides his name and tries to sling mud under a pseudonym, from under the covers, without knowing or understanding the content.
Besides, nobody prevents you from developing something of your own and showing it to us.
I didn't say anything about the content, although I can guess in general that there is butter and pihanina of your other products.
Only about what is in plain sight: you persistently PR in different threads some unknown non-free content in a specific mystifying manner.
You don't show anything, that's the thing. You just go around talking about your cat in the bag.