Discussion of article "Technical Analysis: How Do We Analyze?"

[MetaQuotes]

New article Technical Analysis: How Do We Analyze? is published:

This article briefly describes the author's opinion on redrawing indicators, multi-timeframe indicators and displaying of quotes with Japanese candlesticks. The article contain no programming specifics and is of a general character.

Author: Victor

[[Deleted]]

You are wicked, Victor, not kind.... You not only stepped on the favourite pet peeve of the entire lumpen-proletariat, you stomped on it like a child.

I just wonder why you haven't been banned for such articles. After all, if you translate them into simple language, the date that MT provides and the methods of its analysis that MT offers are not good. Earlier they used to ban you for such articles, but now they even pay you money. It is simply an unprecedented rampant democracy.

[Prival]

He's good. Timbo, you're wrong. I have tears of joy in my eyes. https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1031/page9/#comment_21088 "... the basis of any kind of charts are tickframes..."

I wonder, what do barricades with posters "give tickframes" look like in MT users ? I imagined it... a creepy sight.....

[[Deleted]]

Prival:

He's good. Timbo, you're wrong. I have tears of joy in my eyes. https://www.mql5.com/ru/forum/1031/page9/#comment_21088 "... the basis of any kind of charting is tickframes..."

I wonder, what do barricades with posters "give tickframes" look like in MT users ? I have imagined... a creepy sight.....

What exactly is a "creepy sight", barricades or tikframes ? :)

[Denis Kirichenko]

And I anticipate the conclusion of the trilogy called Technical Analysis: Why do we analyse? :-))

[Prival]

denkir:

And I anticipate the conclusion of the trilogy called Technical Analysis: Why do we analyse? :-))

or maybe the eternal question. What to do? I look forward to the next article

[[Deleted]]

denkir:

And I anticipate the conclusion of the trilogy called Technical Analysis: Why do we analyse? :-))

Prival:
or maybe the eternal question. What to do? I am looking forward to the next article

Why a trilogy? I personally expect more articles devoted to TA.

[Eugeni Neumoin]

Interesting:
Why a trilogy? I personally look forward to more TA articles.

Especially since it pays well.

[Denis Kirichenko]

Interesting:
Why a trilogy? I personally look forward to more TA articles.

Count on it... all the same there are no trends in the future ... :-))

[rsi]

I realised it's a soap opera. It's supposed to be about nothing, then it can go on forever .... The second article, like the first, is about nothing.

[Denis Kirichenko]

rsi:

... The second article, like the first one, is about nothing.

As the classic said, categorisation is characteristic of ignorance.....