Discussion of article "LifeHack for traders: Blending ForEach with defines (#define)" - page 4
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
The nested ForEach is to show that there are no collisions. Right?
Yes.
But it's still better than everything above.
Huh?
How about false?will you correct the error in the article?
Yes, it has already been corrected in the article and in the codes to false.
No. It's not a mistake.
It is a mistake.
If I take your defines and substitute them into my EAs, some of them will not trade at all, because a good tone in MQL4 is to check the context.
There is a correspondence, and I pointed it out. In MQL5 there is no need to check the context, because the terminal itself solves this problem, i.e. the trading context is always free. i.e. the normal analogy is false.
This is a mistake.
The code and article have already been corrected and republished.
Thanks for the criticism
Punto Switcher...
Works in any window/editor where the keyboard works...
Copy the necessary block, paste it into the auto-replacement window, make up an abbreviation...
When entering an abbreviation, a tooltip appears - press enter or tab...
Result...
p.s. At work I use it constantly for many years - it helps a lot).
Punto Switcher...
I didn't know that, thanks
Punto Switcher...
Works in any window/editor where the keyboard works...
Copy the necessary block, paste it into the auto-change window, make up an abbreviation...
When entering an abbreviation, a tooltip appears - press enter or tab...
Result...
p.s. I've been using it at work for many years - very helpful)
New article LifeHack for traders: Blending ForEach with defines (#define) has been published:
Author: webmasterfa
(i,true)