You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
thanks for the article.
Good luck in the financial markets and Happy New Year!
So, are there anyone willing to rewrite the EA code from the article into MQL5 language and upload it to KodoBase?
The code is rewritten in MQL5 and is available in KodoBase: Reduce_risks
The code has been rewritten in MQL5 and is available in KodoBase: Reduce_risks
Added a link to the article itself
I almost fell off my chair, but I could damage my precious head after reading such theses: "MACD-based expert does not have time to react to a sharp price collapse of USDCHF" !!!!! Well, brother, you're crazy. I propose to add to the classification of risks: - friendship with "grief programmers". Why don't you have such a section?
Such a section is better suited for your service, and to avoid falling off your chair - study indicators - MACD is an example of a standard indicator, and nothing more. And before ineptly sneering, you'd better present your developments to the world - you don't see them.
Good ideas, but the EA cannot work because these condition will almost never be true at the same time :
Alexander, thanks for the article !
How applicable/adaptable is your EA to FORTS?
I have run the MQL5-version of the EA on the RTS index in testing/optimisation mode.
By changing MA periods and different coefficients it can be adapted to the derivatives market, but the results (for me) are not very good.
Is it correct that the Expert Advisor is initially "designed" only for the hedging system?
Very good article. It's very useful for the development of my EAs.
Congratulations to the author.
Such a section would be better suited for your service, and in order not to fall off your chair - study indicators - MACD is an example of a standard indicator, and nothing more. And before ineptly sneering, you'd better present your developments to the world - you don't see them.
1. A scientific approach is when a hypothesis is put forward and it is attempted to be destroyed. If it withstands the attack, it becomes an axiom. You put forward a hypothesis, I am trying to destroy it. What's wrong? What's not scientific?
2. What are my developments? Everything has been invented a long time ago: amplitude-phase demodulation.