Historical data - page 6
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
No. The virtual stop wouldn't have close it neither. Gaps happens, you may be angry because you lost that one, but it's also possible to take benefit from : there's way to avoid them, like stop trading few hour before the end of day/week, avoid some days ... it's called time filtering.
Err .. sometimes broker use stoplimits, meaning that a stoploss can't be less far than x points of the open price : it's a manner to pass thru ... Now, how much illegal I dunno, would you be visited by the IRS because of .. I doubt but yeah .. you may be banned !
EDIT : It's a daredevil method : at least I see it so, but you may like it ---> https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/178636
Thank you; I´m gonna take a look in links.
I know that gap can be good or bad...that´s ok; what I didn´t understand is why EA closed long and short with difference of 90 points!! EA close them at same time; EA is working well, It only happened at this gap situation and I can´t understand the reason why. Defeloper told me virtual stops can resolve it...
Thank you; I´m gonna take a look in links.
I know that gap can be good or bad...that´s ok; what I didn´t understand is why EA closed long and short with difference of 90 points!! EA close them at same time; EA is working well, It only happened at this gap situation and I can´t understand the reason why. Defeloper told me virtual stops can resolve it...
Then trust the developper but I can't see how it could have ... as you can see the gap occurs from a bar to another one.
With an already set stoploss, the best price available is taken on broker side ; when a EA closes an order virtually, there's also slippage : slippage (price availability) + execution delay (network & the delay it took to the EA to trigger it).