This averaging algorithm is not the play of a trader
The conclusions are incorrect, because the number of deals in the conducted test for different MAs is elementary different. How can you compare TEMA with 482 deals with VIDA with 333 deals, for example? First of all, it is necessary to conduct the same number of experiments. Then it will be possible to speak in a meaningful way. But, again, this is all a spherical horse in a vacuum. By and large, it is impossible to compare these things on a non-stationary process, which is the dynamics of exchange rates. The fact that some МАшка has shown itself "better" somewhere sometime does not mean that when you put it in real trading it will be even close to something and vice versa. Therefore, everything is random and conclusions can no longer be taken into account in principle.
75,000 options - 4GB
Random Flow Theory and
Criterion for automatic selection
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register