Indicators: Differential indicator by Sultonov - page 3
You are missing trading opportunities:
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
Registration
Log in
You agree to website policy and terms of use
If you do not have an account, please register
Can you give a mathematical calculation proving it (symmetry and similarity of shapes)? So far just someone sees something, some shapes. But nobody has given anything on the essence of "reach".
I could. But I won't.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Фильтр_с_конечной_импульсной_характеристикой
Everything has long been proved.
Have you already modelled in Excel the behaviour of your indicator on the sequence ....00000001011111111....? I suggested it to you earlier, because it is not obvious to you. It will take 15 minutes at most.
When you model it, then we will talk. Otherwise I won't be able to explain anything to you. But, I think, you will understand everything yourself.
It is so obvious that it does not require proof, it follows from itself)
For you the differences between the processes in the real and differential area are unattainable, so you cannot understand the indicator's actions until now, and you and Yuri will never understand why large and small price changes give the same response on the indicator. And the indicator turned out to be right, indicating an adequate reduction of the Bears' strength, analysing small price changes.
Oh, Yusuf.
I bow to you.
Put two mashka next to each other and give them your Name!
It is worthy).
It is obvious that you are ready to disbelieve the simple algorithm of the indicator, which has drawn the fact of the Bears' activity decrease to the previous values, as evidenced by the rise and fall on the chart, and you are having a heated argument with the code creator, who is absolutely sure in the correctness of the calculations.
What does rejection have to do with it? We just see that it does not work and cannot work in any way, because your indicator confuses the present and the past. And we have been trying to explain it to you for hours.
As one of my friends used to say: if three people have already told you that you are drunk, but you are sober and clever - go and sleep it off.
I could. But I won't.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Фильтр_с_конечной_импульсной_характеристикой
Everything has long been proven.
Oh, Yusuf.
I bow to you.
Put two mashka next to each other and give them your name!
It is worthy).
What's that got to do with rejection? We just see that it doesn't work and can't work at all. And we have been trying to explain it to you for hours.
As one of my friends used to say: if three people have already told you that you're drunk, but you're sober and smart - go and sleep it off.
Don't confuse ordinary MAs and differential MAs and if you don't understand the difference between them, it's not my fault.
Who cares why everyone proves something. Any indicator is based on OHLC price, but for some reason few people notice it and do not condemn it.
P.S. Regression channel, they say it is cool and awesome, but what is it based on, is it not on the price, so can it be scrapped?Have you already modelled in Excel the behaviour of your indicator on the sequence ....00000001011111111....? I suggested it to you earlier, because it is not obvious to you. It will take 15 minutes at most.
When you model it, then we will talk. Otherwise I won't be able to explain anything to you. But I think you'll understand everything yourself.