can some expert please analyze my result? - page 2

New comment
 

This ea really is written by a noob. He doesn't have any mathematical methods nor have he discovered anything unique. Results without codes is simply meaningless.

 

and who wrote it?

i assume it sees at least 15 mins ahead in time :P

 
and who wrote it? dunno.. but he should be shot lol.
 

we could go hunting this days...with markets being so quiet :

 
MickyMouse:

So bottom line is, if you really want somebody to be able to analyze it, put a version as the one you have on you`re first post... otherwise, impossible mate .

this one has 4 consecutive wins, 4 consecutive losses with a profit factor of 1.02 ... it is deffenetly not working like the one in first post :D.


Hi Micky,

thanks for all your reply

Sorry for attaching the wrong EA. Please find attached the correct one

For the below result - Base Currency=GBP, Deposit=1000, Risk=1%, SL/TP = 50



 
jpbiznes:

Hi Micky,

thanks for all your reply

Sorry for attaching the wrong EA. Please find attached the correct one

For the below result - Base Currency=GBP, Deposit=1000, Risk=1%, SL/TP = 50




well this backtest and the ea is deffenetly not the one from post 1. but lets have a look
 
jpbiznes:

For the below result - Base Currency=GBP, Deposit=1000, Risk=1%, SL/TP = 50

Trading EURUSD with a base currency of GBP may well explain why your risk is wrong . . .
 
yes but how u risk 1% with 0.3 lots? and than 0.7?
 
i cannot know because i cannot compare ure test with my test, because you are not saying what settings you are using
 
MickyMouse:
yes but how u risk 1% with 0.3 lots? and than 0.7?

Hi Micky,

i have trouble finding the lots

first, 1.30000 - 1.30500 = (0.0050)/0.0001 = 50 pips .... is this correct?

and

GBP1000*1% = 10 GBP

how to calculate requried lots to get £10 from 50 pips trading EURUSD ?

My code is.. please correct if this wrong

double nextlot()
{
double lot;
int profit=10;
int TP=50;
lot = NormalizeDouble(profit/TP,1);

if(lot>=0.1) return(lot);
else return(0.1);
}
1234
New comment